My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020-2024
>
2023
>
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 12:08:41 PM
Creation date
5/9/2023 12:01:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />April 24, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br />Finance Director Olson explained that according to the contract, if there is an overage, the City would pay <br />its percentage of the operating budget. The invoice just says $46,010.50 as Orono’s share of the overage. <br />Olson said he contacted Long Lake for some detail. The amount includes $15,000 for the payout of the <br />fire chief’s unpaid sick and vacation when he left; an overage of fire call pay of $21,000; winterizing the <br />Zodiac boat; $17,000 for training for eight new fire fighters; and $5,600 for travel/mileage reimbursement <br />where he said they normally budget zero. Olson said the fire call overage is nearly 50 percent which <br />doesn’t necessarily make sense. He said he would like more information on that and the training and <br />travel. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if under the existing contract the City is obligated to pay any overage they charge, whether <br />Long Lake accrues for pay-outs for time off and whether there have been overages in previous years. <br /> <br />Olson said that is how the contract reads. Last year the overage was $15,000. He added that Orono <br />accrues for payout of benefits but evidently Long Lake does not. <br /> <br />Leah Koch, attending for City Attorney Mattick, said she personally has not reviewed the contract but <br />will make a note to clarify the City’s obligations under the contract. <br /> <br />Johnson said if everyone's in agreement, he would like to get more details on precisely what the City of <br />Orono is being asked to pay and whether it is operational or capital improvements. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the claims and bills minus the Fire Protection <br />Services 2022 Fire Overages in the amount of $46,010.50. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />4. APPROVAL OF NEXT DRAFT WORK SESSION AGENDA <br />Walsh said he pulled this off the consent agenda because there were a couple of things planned for the <br />May 22 work session that he did not think belonged there. He said he would move to postpone the <br />Community Survey Discussion to December 11 and delete the meeting decorum discussion because <br />political grievances do not have a place at Council meetings and work sessions. <br />Johnson asked how items are getting on the work session agenda. <br />City Administrator Edwards reminded the Council that having a draft work session agenda approved at <br />the previous Council meeting is a fairly new process. Some items are routine and come up year after year. <br />Other items are requested by Council members. <br />Walsh and Johnson said they did not think the draft work session agendas should be on consent portion of <br />the agenda because it is necessary for the Council to review the items and vote on them. <br />Benson asked to clarify if the procedure will be to throw out suggestions for the next work session topics <br />at a work session and then vote on them at a Council meeting. She said she was fine with throwing out <br />ideas in the work session and taking the work session draft agenda off consent, because then we can be in <br />agreement about what's coming. She noted that her only question is with regard to work session agenda <br />items. It may be at times that one Council member has ideas or two that are valid ideas, and this is a place <br />to discuss them. Meeting decorum is something that she feels strongly about given what's happening right <br />now in our community. That is something that she thought was worthy of Council time, at least in a work
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.