My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
05-08-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 12:08:41 PM
Creation date
5/9/2023 12:01:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />April 17, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />3. LA23-000014 SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON, 1007 WILDHURST TRAIL, VARIANCE <br /> <br />City Planner Curtis said the purpose of the application is to consider an average lakeshore setback variance on the <br />newly oriented lot at 1007 Wildhurst Trail. The existing home at 1003 Wildhurst would remain and is not part of this <br />application. The applicant is in the process of designing a new home for the 1007 lot. The homes on 1003 Wildhurst <br />and 4455 West Branch Road create an average Lakeshore setback line bisecting the center of the subject lot. The <br />applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction up to the 75-foot setback. Approval <br />would be subject to the County approving the pending lot line changes. The applicants have identified the unique lake <br />channel orientation for both the new lot and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch Road to the north as <br />creating difficulties. Applicants are in attendance. Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the <br />properties along the lakeshore channels create an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property which <br />is restricting development near the lake. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether the proposal fits <br />within the character of neighborhood, whether practical difficulties exist, and whether or not there is any lake view <br />impact to consider. Staff recommends approval. <br /> <br />Bollis clarified that the proposal would meet the 75-foot setback but it’s the average setback for which the variance is <br />being requested. <br /> <br />Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, said there are currently three PIDs on this property. There is a large, undeveloped <br />chunk of land purchased when there was talk of putting seven or eight houses in there and neighbors wanted to keep <br />density lower. So in an effort to reduce the density of this area, his proposal was to bring it down to two lots. And then <br />in doing so, the average lakeshore setback gets connected from the property to the north, and then connects to the <br />property at 1003 Wildhurst Trail that he also owns. Average lakeshore setback was intended to preserve the lake views <br />between neighbors and lake. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Kirchner said it reminded him of another case a few months ago. In reality, we are looking at a two-lot application <br />here, not a three-lot. <br /> <br />McCutcheon said if it was three we wouldn’t be talking about this. One house is extremely on the west side but since <br />they are combining, it’s a lakeshore lot. Where the house is located now it makes a lot of sense. As you look at the <br />neighborhood to the south they are all about that distance from the lake, so I think it fits the character of the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Bollis said it goes back to the intent of the ordinance. I don’t think it creates an issue with sight lines. <br /> <br />Kirchner said the property is heavily wooded. Because of woods I don’t even know what sight lines would be there. <br /> <br />Libby said staff has done a good job and given us a lot of good information. The applicant has tried to position the <br />house so does not obstruct any other lake views. I’m in favor of this but we still have to have the County to chime in on <br />this because of the subdivision of the lot. <br /> <br />Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000014, 1007 Wildhurst Trail, variance. <br />VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.