Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> April 24,2023 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Finance Director Olson explained that according to the contract, if there is an overage,the City would pay <br /> its percentage of the operating budget. The invoice just says$46,010.50 as Orono's share of the overage. <br /> Olson said he contacted Long Lake for some detail. The amount includes $15,000 for the payout of the <br /> fire chiefs unpaid sick and vacation when he left; an overage of fire call pay of$21,000;winterizing the <br /> Zodiac boat; $17,000 for training for eight new fire fighters; and$5,600 for travel/mileage reimbursement <br /> where he said they normally budget zero. Olson said the fire call overage is nearly 50 percent which <br /> doesn't necessarily make sense.He said he would like more information on that and the training and <br /> travel. <br /> Johnson asked if under the existing contract the City is obligated to pay any overage they charge,whether <br /> Long Lake accrues for pay-outs for time off and whether there have been overages in previous years. <br /> Olson said that is how the contract reads.Last year the overage was$15,000. He added that Orono <br /> accrues for payout of benefits but evidently Long Lake does not. <br /> Leah Koch,attending for City Attorney Mattick,said she personally has not reviewed the contract but <br /> will make a note to clarify the City's obligations under the contract. <br /> Johnson said if everyone's in agreement,he would like to get more details on precisely what the City of <br /> Orono is being asked to pay and whether it is operational or capital improvements. <br /> Johnson moved,Crosby seconded,to approve the claims and bills minus the Fire Protection <br /> Services 2022 Fire Overages in the amount of$46,010.50.VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 4. APPROVAL OF NEXT DRAFT WORK SESSION AGENDA <br /> Walsh said he pulled this off the consent agenda because there were a couple of things planned for the <br /> May 22 work session that he did not think belonged there.He said he would move to postpone the <br /> Community Survey Discussion to December 11 and delete the meeting decorum discussion because <br /> political grievances do not have a place at Council meetings and work sessions. <br /> Johnson asked how items are getting on the work session agenda. <br /> City Administrator Edwards reminded the Council that having a draft work session agenda approved at <br /> the previous Council meeting is a fairly new process. Some items are routine and come up year after year. <br /> Other items are requested by Council members. <br /> Walsh and Johnson said they did not think the draft work session agendas should be on consent portion of <br /> the agenda because it is necessary for the Council to review the items and vote on them. <br /> Benson asked to clarify if the procedure will be to throw out suggestions for the next work session topics <br /> at a work session and then vote on them at a Council meeting. She said she was fine with throwing out <br /> ideas in the work session and taking the work session draft agenda off consent,because then we can be in <br /> agreement about what's coming. She noted that her only question is with regard to work session agenda <br /> items.It may be at times that one Council member has ideas or two that are valid ideas,and this is a place <br /> to discuss them.Meeting decorum is something that she feels strongly about given what's happening right <br /> now in our community. That is something that she thought was worthy of Council time,at least in a work <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br />