My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-12-01 Letter, Lot Line Rearrangement
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
4045 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-14-0022
>
Correspondence
>
1989-12-01 Letter, Lot Line Rearrangement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:23:50 PM
Creation date
5/4/2023 3:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4045
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
4045 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0611723140022
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(:John McDowell <br />4045 Bayside Road <br />ain MN <br />Iffitylgi-r Ell f CC <br />Post officr Bot 660Crysul Bay. Minnewts %323•Murucipal Offwm <br />On the North. 5ht re o/ Lake Minnetonka <br />December 1, 1989 <br />Re: Subdivision Proposal - Application !1475 <br />Dear Mr. McDowell: <br />Today I received a phone call from Lori Howe of Faegre & <br />Benson requesting information about procedures for proceeding <br />with merely a lot line rearrangement between your homestead <br />parcel and Charles Hayssen's homestead parcel. Prior to your <br />leaving town, we had briefly discussed the potential City <br />concerns and requirements for such a proposal. <br />You had expressed a concern that the City might still <br />require granting a private road outlot as part of a mere lot line <br />rearrangement. Although I had indicated that was not as likely <br />with a lot line rearrangement, Jeanne and I have discussed the <br />issues at some length, and in light of the access issues and <br />Planning Commission's concerns regarding access and private roads <br />in the City, it would not be out of the question for them to <br />require road outlot dedication. It would also not be out of the <br />question for them to hold up even a lot line rearrangement <br />pending resolution of the access issues. <br />In order to give Ms. Howe clear direction as to the <br />requirements for a lot line rearrangement, Jeanne and I reviewed <br />the subdivision code regarding the need for a plat vs. a simple <br />metes and bounds division. It is our opinion that the code does <br />not specifically address whether this lot line rearrangement must <br />be a plat, however we feel that given the nature of the access <br />concerns which have evolved along with the fact that these <br />ro erties don't abut a dedicated public or private roadway, <br />�ec�nically variances to the zoning code are required, making <br />this a "flexible zoning application" which requires a plat. <br />As I mentioned before you left town, you would be well <br />advised to discuss these issues with Jeanne Mabusth prior to <br />revising your application. <br />at ILDIM. a Zo%l%(; - 473-735i 0 ADNI%LqjTR)%I1O% A FIN14WL - 473.73 . ri I+i a %% Rk, A-% -,i-, <br />ANS111"1NG FAX - 4734510 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.