Laserfiche WebLink
i.t•�,•,r1t• `� [� C� C OM � <br />hr R 1987 'J <br />Am F-1 Bank HBca w•e,t <br />July 28, 1987 <br />%4-- lrnhe <br />A.I.—Ota 55067 <br />T.Me..m 16121.1M M41 <br />I eWcrp,w 16121333Lt506 <br />Mr. Frank Mixa <br />Gavin[ leFevae <br />Executive Director <br />H"benP Letle. <br />Lake Minnetonka Conservation <br />J Def"Y 08— <br />,hM., F [Newt <br />District <br />Dn.ndJ K,*•m,1r <br />402 East Lake Street <br />,Am"'ItE 11d,Mta, <br />Wayzata, rill 55391 <br />k•.kv.. E Pw,A,., <br />ltrlwdJ Sct.ett.. <br />Re: Dianis v. Narren <br />C1wlm L. LeFe we <br />14.M+1 P t:"Y 111 <br />• Jnn.esJ 11,.nt.ca,J. <br />Dear Frank: <br />T Imn"„ R Gell <br />Dade NoW, <br />Attached is a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions <br />Steven s�► Wt <br />of Law and Order of Judge Rogers in the above -entitled <br />jan,"" St.o„n.a. <br />case. <br />Flo-nW N. Rnttr <br />%Vae"'P•1oiw, <br />Although Mr. and Mrs. Dianis may not be too happy with <br />9 Y ! P}' <br />W46m R Skene.tnl <br />RodnrvD A,.$ -,so. <br />the result of this case, it does protect the LMCD <br />C..mwA 16•..0 <br />ordinances. The Court concluded that the H. rrens have a <br />Bnw,tA... <br />legal right to construct a dock from the Dianis property. <br />9 9 p Y <br />Poul E Ftasr.■num <br />PMAE <br />Steven M. To— <br />However, the dock must be outside of the LMCD setback <br />MwvFwKeeSke'^ <br />area and, therefore, within the Dianis authorized dock <br />C1.0100wJ NW -00W <br />use area. <br />T.mntw ,1 rnm.nr <br />MA A <br />Ju&eA e -W- <br />Assuming this case is not roversed on appeal, it could be <br />helpful in future cases where creation of dockage rights <br />by easement result in a conflict with LMCD ordinances. <br />If you have any questions, please feel tree to give me a <br />call. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Charles L. LeFevere <br />CLL:rsr <br />Enclosure <br />REC;bIv�. <br />JUL i U i987 <br />LM.C.D. <br />