04-05-1976 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

composition of that 1971 staff, and the staff which prepared the Buide Plan, Report #3. (c)State what differences, if any, exist between the composition of that 1971 staff and the staff which prepared the amended zoning ordinance. A.Unable to locate Ralph Martin to ask him if he made such a statement and if he did, why he did make such a statement. 16.Attach the following: (a)Planning Commission Minutes for July 5, 1972, pages 3 and 4. (b)Planning Commission Minutes for July 12, 1972, pages 1 and 2. (c)Planning Commission Minutes for August 7, 1972, page 3. (d)P.C. Minutes for August 21, 1972, page 1. (e)P.C. Minutes for November 20, 1972, page 1. (f)P.C. Minutes for Feb. 5, 1973, page 2. (g)Minutes of the July 17, 1972 joint meeting of the P.C. and the Orono City Council, pages 1 and 2. A.Request of interrogatory is beyond the scope of Rule 33 of Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. See answer to interrogatory number 1. 17.Attach the following: (a)Copies of all memoranda and reports prepared by Brauer and Associates for the City of Orono. (b)A copy of the August 17, 1972 memorandum from Nike Scheller to the Planning Commission and the article on zoning he attached to this memorandum. A.See answer to interrogatory.number 16. 18.Give the names and addresses of all individuals who were on Council and Commission during the year 1969 through 1974. A.See answer to interrogatory number 1. 19.Give the names and addresses of all individuals, in addition to those given in item f*18 above, who meaningfully parti cipated in the initiation and/or formulation of the Guide Plan and amended zoning ordinance, and state what wes the nature of that participation. A.See answer to interrogatory number 1. 20.Attach copies of all memoranda, correspondence, and documentation sent by the Council, tlie Commission, or any other persons employed by or associated with the City of Orono, to the Metropolitan Council, pertaining to the Guide Plan or Zoning Amendment. -5-