Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
I <br />\ ./ <br />i ■ <br />i <br />i •v' <br />;? , <br />i <br />I •* ♦ <br />fr <br />5j f. <br />I <br />$ 'T <br />11 <br />‘ I ‘ <br />1 ‘, <br />i * <br />'. « V —• <br />ri/: <br />%V- <br />* <br />. A iti^>r4 <br />< <br />•> <br />" *> # <br />t '• V <br />A-V ? <br />’A*. \ wV' " <br />.* i'- <br />•V ., ♦ <br />p;:>^ <br />f"’'«* ', . .■ <br />/-N n <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATIE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />W. R. Benson <br />H, F. Muhich #85 <br />January 15, 1976 <br />Quentin Johnson, Allen Doubldee and Ken Lantto <br />3509 Ivy Place - Subdivision - Preliminary <br />Mr. Johnson owns Lots 72, 75, 76 and part of Lot 77. Mr. Doid>ledee re> <br />cently purchased lots 73 and 74 and applied for Building Permits on the <br />two substandard lots. I explained the situation to the applicant so he <br />has made an agreement with Mr. Johnson to purchase part of Lot 75 and <br />include this in a newly proposed palt along with the alley which they <br />are also requesting be vacated. <br />Parcel 1 would be 94 feet wide and consist of .40 acres and Parcel 2 <br />would exceed 100 ft. width and consist of .49 acres. This area is zoned <br />LR-IC (i/2 acre - 100 ft. lot width) Approval of this sid)idivsion would <br />include the following variances: <br />Parcel 1 - .1 acre area and 6 ft. lot width <br />Parcel 2 - .01 acre area only <br />Approval of the vacation of the alley would also be necessa^. The <br />Planning Gonaission should schedule a Public Hearing regarding this <br />subdivision and vacation proposal. <br />PLANNING OtWISSION MEETING - January 19, 1976 <br />The Comnissi(m scheduled a Public Hearing for 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, February <br />17, 1976. <br />The Planning Coranission agreed the proposed alley vacation would be no benefit <br />to the general piiilic but would definitely increase the values of the subject <br />properties. They requested the Zoning Acbninistrator to consult with the Assessor <br />to determine the benefit tiiat would result from this vacation. <br />PLANNING OOWISSION MEETING - February 17, 1976 <br />Because of the extent of objection at the Public Hearing, the Planning Connission <br />continued the Pii)lic Hearing until the meeting of March 1, 1976 for time for <br />additional review of the proposal. <br />A <br />I