Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25.1999 <br />ZONING ADNnNi:OR’S REPORT <br />E <br />“(#4) #2519 MATTHEW AND ROBK^TALOCH, 4705 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4366 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESQJ^^ION NO. 4366, <br />a Resolution Granting an Amendment to a Variance to Permit ColMcuction of an <br />Accessory Structure Between the Principal Building and the Street. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />>1^ (#5) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC, COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILLOW VIEW <br />Marty Campion and David Newman, Bancor Group, Inc., were present. <br />W'einberger stated that the Applicant has submitted an application for a 5i acre parcel located <br />at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Planning Commission <br />and City Council has reviewed the proposed development as a sketch plan. <br />Weinberger stated that the preliminary plat application requires a number of approvals for the <br />subdivision, namely, rezoning of the property which is currently zoned RR- IB. The Applicants <br />are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-IA to allow one acre per unit densit>- and to <br />de\ :lop the property’ as a Planned Residential Development. The surrounding properties to this <br />site .nclude two acre density east of Willow Drive, low density residential north of Count>‘ Road 6, <br />the C.'ono School Campus, with the future middle school site to the west, and possible townhome <br />or office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway to the south. It may be appropriate to <br />utilize this prope.ty as a buffer zone berveen the mi.xed uses surrounding the proposed development. <br />Development of this site as a PRD w ould allow for the creation of conservation outlots along <br />Countj- Road 6 and Willow D.-’we, with the highest density of lots being located within the interior <br />of the property. <br />The Planning Commission has reviewed this application and is recommending denial on a six <br />to zero vote based on the following: One, the Planning Commission is not in a position to change <br />the Comprehensive Plan; tw o, if the property is rezoned, it should be to provide an alternate <br />housing style or provide for a housing need not currently being met. and three, the proposed <br />number of lots may be loo dense. Weinberger noted that municipal sew er and w ater are available <br />to this site, with the proposed development of the property' taking advantage of the services <br />available. <br />Weinberger stated that the Applicants have provided three rev ised concept plans based on the <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission and comments from the adjacent property' owners <br />Mayor Jabbour indicated that he would rather not review the revised concept plans at this time <br />due to the fact that a public hearing has not been held which would enable the general public to <br />comment on the revised concept plans. Jabbour noted that the City Council generally follows <br />the recommendations of the Planning Commission and that their input is desired before a decision <br />Page 4