12-13-1999 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (^f2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) property as a Planned Residential Development. The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD would allow we property to be developed at one unit per acre, with City sewer and water being available to these proposed units. This property could net sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high v/ater table and soil types present. Weinberger stated that the property to the south may be developed at c with a two acre density development east of V/illow Drive, a low density residential north of County Road 6. and the Oreno School Campus to the west. This development would serve as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east versus the other land uses to the south and west. The Applicants are proposing a plan that would r®sult in the nearest home being located approximately 225 feet from County Road 6. Several berrns are being proposed throughout the development, and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style homes. Access to this development v/ould be off of V/illow Drive, v/ith no aocess off of County Road 6. City Staff recommends that the proposed Intersection between the development and Shadowood Drive be aligned, whether it's through the extension of the northerly road or the other curb cut being relocated further north, to eliminate traffic turning left. The access points are proposed to ce approximately 200 feet apart. Weinberger stated that standard drainage and utility easements would be required, as v/ell as parkland dedication. Weinberger stated the Applicants could have the option of donating 8 percent of the land value or designating a portion of the development for trails. Weinberger stated that the hookup costs for City sewer and v/ater will need to be discussed further. Weinberger noted that the City Council has established less restrictive zoning standards for other PROS, including French Creek and Sugar.vocds. Lindquist commented that he is hesitant to approve rezoning of this area due to the high density housing that is being proposed. Newman stated that the high densihy is necessary due to the connection costs for City sewer and v/ater, noting that they have reviewed the costs involved in this project and that in order to onset their expenses, upper market housing will need to be constructed In this area, Lindquist inquired whether they have calculated the average lot size for this development. Nev/man replied they have not yet made that calculation. Campion stated that they are conle.mplating lots that average around a half-acre, with the smallest being one-third acre, Stoddard commented that he would like to see a residential development in this area. but that in his view the City Council may wish to retain the two acre zoning. Stoddard stated he is the economics involved fer this development, but that he personally would like to see larger lo . Newman stated that this is an expensive parcel of property to develop, and that not all the residences v/ill be constructed v/ith walkouts. Page 11