My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 1:42:32 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. <br />December 7, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />Comments to Guide Mn/DOT Purine the Final Design Phase <br />1. Sewer trunk line replacement. <br />As part of the new Highway 12 construction project, Mn/DOT will remove and replace City <br />and MCES sewer lines that are currently located in the railroad right-of-way. These lines <br />will be replaced by a line or lines that meet the current and projected sewer capacity needs <br />of both Orono and Long Lake. <br />2. Stormwater management. <br />The City of Long Lake has requested Mn/DOT to study options for diverting a portion of the <br />stormwater runoff to a pond adjacent to the sewer property in Long Lake, rather than <br />directing the flow into Long Lake. The purpose is to reduce the potential for flooding, and <br />to improve the water qualit> of Long Lake. At the March 3, 1999 Highway 12 Design <br />Review Committee meeting, Nancy Yew, Mn/DOT Water Resources staff, acknowledged <br />there was an “unknown” risk of deteriorated water quality coming out of the pond adjacent <br />to the sewer property in Long Lake if the proposed stormwater diversion plan was adopted. <br />Nancy indicated a more comprehensive study would have to be done to better quantify this <br />risk. Although the City is supportive of improving the water quality of Long Lake, it is not <br />supportive of doing so at the expense of the viability of wetlands along Long Lake Creek and <br />of the long-term water quality of Lake Minnetonka. It is imperative that prior to any decision <br />regarding the diversion option, substantial analysis is conducted to determine water qualify’ <br />impacts. <br />3. Corridor lighting. <br />Mn/DOT has indicated lighting along the corridor will be limited to the bridge and <br />interchange areas. Lighting will be added along the corridor only if an accident problem <br />develops that is specifically caused by. and can be ameliorated by, the addition of lighting. <br />If this situation occurs, Mn/DOT will work with the affected cities to develop a lighting plan <br />that addresses the accident problem while minimizing the amount and height of lighting. It <br />is important that Mn/DOT is flexible in its lighting design so that Mn/DOT can work with <br />the cities to minimize the height of the lighting, so that the spillover of light from the <br />roadway to adjacent properties is minimized. <br />4. Vibration and noise mitigation. <br />The City has contracted with HDR Engineering to conduct a study of noise and vibration <br />impacts along the highway/railroad corridor. It is important that Mn/DOT make optimal
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.