Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />December 13, 1999 <br />Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects <br />City policy also provides a distinction between projects for assessment purposes. Projects are now <br />classified as either a "mandatory' or "voluntary" project. A mandatory project is required in <br />neighborhoods with a large number of failing septic systems, and no availability of adequate <br />replacement septic sites. Failing septic systems are systems with cesspools or surface discharge of <br />effluent creating a public health hazard. The North Long Lake and Orono Orchards projects were <br />mandatory projects. <br />Voluntary projects are for neighborhoods with nonconforming septic systems. Nonconforming septic <br />systems are systems that do not meet a three-foot separation from the seasonal high ground water <br />level. Nonconforming systems are not an imminent threat to public health. These neighborhoods also <br />generally have replacement septic sites which the owners may not want to use because of loss of <br />trees or yard space. Sewer is being offered to these neighborhoods, as the most desirable permanent <br />solution, on a voluntary basis. If the property owners are interested in sewer, they have to agree to <br />be assessed for all of the project costs. <br />In summary, recent changes have resulted in resident questions regarding cost allocation policies <br />for sanitary sewer projects. These changes are the sew ering of isolated neighborhoods not adjacent <br />to existing MUSA areas, the Metropolitan Council provision of additional sewer units that greatly <br />simplify sewering of properties outside the MUSA line, and changes in the Cin’s assessment <br />policies. <br />One of the three projects that required long forcemains from the existing neighborhoods to existing <br />sewer facilities was the North Long Lake/ Long Lake Countiy Club project. This project was <br />constructed in 1997. Four additional properties along North Brown Road were connected to sewer <br />using the additional Metropolitan Council sewer units. This was a mandatory project with a City <br />subsidy to limit the project assessments to the benefits received from the project. The issue of cost <br />allocation, for the long sections of forcemain outside of the sewered neighborhoods, was not a <br />resident issue for this project. This reason for this was probably because of the reduced project <br />assessments. <br />The other two projects that will require long forcemains from the neighborhoods to e.xisting sewer <br />facilities are the Webber Hills and Fox Ridge projects. These are both voluntaiy projects in which <br />the residents w ill be assessed for all of the project costs. The public hearing for Webber Hills has <br />already been held and plans and specifications are being prepared. The issue of cost allocation for <br />the long forcemain was not an issue for the residents. <br />A public hearing for the Fox Ridge project was held, and the residents were questioning the cost <br />allocation for the forcemain along South Brown Road to the City of Long Lake. The plan presented <br />to the neighborhood was to assess the costs for the entire project, including the Brown Road <br />forcemain to the Fox Ridge residents. They were concerned about paying for the Brown Road