My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 1:42:32 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 <br />Lindquist stated he wants to see a minimum of one acre zoning for this development. <br />Berg stated the Fire Department will probably question the width of the road and request that It be <br />made wider to insure adequate access for emergency vehicles. <br />Chair Hawn commented that it would be appropriate to table this application at this time to allow <br />the Applicant time to resolve some of these Issues. <br />Weinberger noted that there are no conservation areas planned at this time. <br />Gaffron stated in order for a PRD to be approved, the benefits to the City must be shown, and that <br />clustering is utilized to help reduce infrastructure costs or preserve more open space and providing <br />a larger open area by preserving the wetlands. <br />Stoddard commented he would like to see lower density and more outlets for this development. <br />Stoddard stated he would be in favor of a PRD if more benefits could be demonstrated, such as <br />more outlets. <br />Chair Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to table the <br />application at this time to allow him time to resolve these issues. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he would like the Planning Commission to vote on his application tonight. <br />Gaffron stated if the application is denied, it would proceed to the City Council. If the City Council <br />denies it, at that point the Applicant would need to wait six months before submitting a new <br />application. <br />Van Eeckhout commented he would like the input of the City Council as well on his application. <br />Smith stated the Planning Commission would like to see the Applicant be more fully prepared <br />before proceeding to the City Council, noting that the Planning Commission has provided some good <br />direction to the Applicant on how to proceed. Smith indicated she would prefer to review the <br />application again after the Applicant has resolved some of these issues. <br />Hawn moved. Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2550, Charles <br />Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South, per the submitted materials, noting that there is <br />insufficient information available to the Planning Commission in order to make a <br />Page 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.