My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
11-22-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 12:54:37 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 12:51:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner <br />November 9, 1999 <br />#2530 William Wear <br />2160 Wayzata Boulevard <br />Variances for Signage _____ <br />Zoning District:B-1 Retail Sales Business District <br />Exhibit <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />J <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Site Survey <br />Proposed pylon sign plan <br />Proposed canopy sign plan <br />Site photos <br />Sign survey completed by Suburban Lighting, Inc. <br />Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 <br />Resolution No. 2073 <br />Revised sign plan (for consideration) <br />The Planning Commission tabled the request by William Wear to locate new signage on the property <br />not in conformance with the Resolution approving a sign plan in 1986. The applicant had proposed <br />a 59 s.f pylon sign and two conoco, canopy signs. The monument sign has been reduced from 89 <br />s.f. The Planning Commission reviewed the signage on the property and determined there was a <br />substantial amount of signage that was not in conformance with the requirements of Resolution <br />2073. <br />It was recommended the applicant revise the sign plan *o allow 380 s.f. which the property would <br />be allowed if the zoning matched the ise of the property The Planning Commission made the <br />following findings: <br />1.The use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the "B-3" Shopping Center <br />District. If the property Is zoned B-3 the lot would be allowed 380 s.f of sign space. A <br />variance could be justified based on the use of the property is similar to that of a property in <br />the B-3 District. The Planning Commission noted in 1986 the applicable B-1 zoning <br />standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping <br />standards were found more appropriate when considering signage needs ot the property. <br />§2530 n'llliam tt’tar <br />2160 H'o}~ata Bhd <br />11/15/99 <br />Page I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.