Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY OF THE 199ft SHORELINE STORAGE COUNT <br />The total number of watercraft stored, beached or rafting on Lake Minnetonka for 1999 <br />was 8,797. Appendix B highlights this figure and provides a breakdown, by watercraft <br />classification and bay. Further analysis indicate that 5,499 watercraft were stored at <br />riparian residences and that 3,298 watercraft were stored at multiple dock facilities. <br />Results indicate that over 61 % of the wateraaft counted on Lake Minnetonka were <br />either found In the runabout or cruiser classification. The lowest percent of watercraft <br />stored on the lake were classified in the houseboat, charter boat and aircraft <br />classifications with less than 1 %. <br />Appendix B highlights the 5,499 watercraft stored at riparian residences in 1999. <br />Approximately 65% of the wateraaft stored on riparian shoreline were found to in <br />either the runabout or cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure indicates <br />that 47% of the wateraaft inventoried were runabouts and that 18% wore cruisers. The <br />lowest percent of wateraaft stored at riparian residences wore found to bo in the house <br />boat, charter boat, and airaaft classifications, which total loss than 1 %. These <br />percentages are slightly skewed because District staff was unable to distinguish the <br />wateraaft counted, by classification, at riparian residences because of the Mound <br />Commons Docking Program. Further details of this drawback are discussed later in the <br />text. <br />Appendix C highlights the 3.298 wateraaft stored at multiple docks In 1999. <br />Approximately 56% of wateraaft stored at multiple docks wore found to be In either the <br />runabout and cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure Indicates that 38% <br />of the wateraaft wore runabouts and that 18% were cruisers. The lowest percentage of <br />wateraaft stored at multiple docks wore houseboat, charter boat, and airaaft <br />classifications, which total less than 1 %. Again, these percentages are slightly skewed <br />because District staff was unable to distinguish the wateraaft counted, by classification, <br />at multiple dock facilities because of the Mound Commons Docking Program. <br />The City of Mound indicated to Distria staff that 538 wateraaft. on eight bays, were <br />located at the Mound Commons Docks In 1999. These bays are highlighted by an (*) in <br />Appendix B and C. Further breakdown of these wateraaft are detailed below: <br />Cooks Bay 96 <br />Phelps Bay 115 <br />Black Lake 67 <br />Emerald Lake 4 <br />Seton Lake 25 <br />Harrisons Bay 154 <br />Jennings Bay 39 <br />West Arm 38m <br />Because this documentation was provided by the City of Mound, ^e Report is accurate <br />with regards to total riparian and multiple do^ wateraaft inventoried in 1999. The <br />drawback is that these 538 wateraaft were not broken down by wateraaft classification