Laserfiche WebLink
rtlllUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER/ll, 1991 <br />^M695 THOMAS & ALICE STUCK AND JOHN M. BAUER, <br />43^^/4363 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />A) y,;3DIVISI0N OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT <br />B) VAft^NCE TO THE MORATORIUM ORDINANCE #96, ZHD SERIES <br />PUBLIC Hfc<\RING 8:20-8:27 P.M. <br />Thomas and Stuck were present for tKis application. <br />It was moved by Kelley, secondecp^y Johnson, to approve the <br />variance to the mOTK^orium Ordinao<^ #96, Second Series for <br />Application #1695 cts. allow a ^Subdivision of a lot line <br />rearrangement for 4345 ahd 4365SJorth Shore Drive, based on the <br />unique characteristics of «vg/iots, no new lots being created, <br />and this rearrangement wasySufe^sted by the Planning Commission <br />in an earlier variance ap^J^caticS^^for the Stucks. Ayes 6, nays <br />w • <br />Gaffron explained th^4f this is a requesES^r subdivision of a lot <br />line rearrangement Jfo increase the size or^t^ie Stuck property and <br />to place the exil^ting garage within their p^si^perty boundaries. <br />Applicants are jrtso requesting a revision in theix prior variance <br />approval to bpi^allowed to construct the portion oP’^^ck that was <br />previously jjienied, now that the property will incre£iV«^. in area. <br />It wasjifoved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to rd^mmend <br />approv^ of Application #1695 for Thomas and Alice Stuck an^v^John <br />M. Bauer, for properties at 4345 and 4365 North Shore Drive, Tor <br />^Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement, and to further alia <br />t^e deck addition of 180 s.f. additional hardcover. Ayes 6, nays 0^_ _ _ <br />(#6) ROBERT J. BILGER, <br />4005 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:30-8:39 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was <br />noted. <br />Robert Bilger was present for this application. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicant is requesting setback and <br />hardcover variances to construct a detached garage. Staff has <br />suggested moving the garage 5* to the north to allow use of a <br />proposed backout apron. A 15’ setback is required because the <br />garage and workshop are over 750 s.f. and the garage would be 8' <br />from the side lot line if moved 5' to the north. She noted that <br />the workshop is to the north of the garage. <br />Bilger indicated that they intend to drive in and back out the <br />entire length of the driveway and need to .’.aintain the garage at <br />the proposed location. <br />Mabusth stated that the garage was recommended to be moved <br />because of the backout apron shown on the plans. <br />8