Laserfiche WebLink
3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15, 1999 and <br />recommended approval on a vote of 7 to 0. <br />4. The Plaiming Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The property does not have a garage on it. <br />B. The lot is small for the LR-IC Zoning District. <br />5. <br />6. <br />C. This is the only location on the lot the garage can be placed. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6