My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
11-08-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 12:54:48 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 12:51:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16,1998 <br />(#2395 Brent Bentrott, continued) <br />did not understand what exactly was being proposed, and they were advised that they needed <br />to have an independent person review the plan on their behalf. <br />Bentrott commented he has been speaking with the Palms about this project, noting that they have <br />endorsed this project in the past. <br />Van Zomeren stated that one issue is the fact that the curb cut and driveway does not meet City <br />standards, and that the Public Service Director would not approve it as proposed. <br />Schroeder commented he was not sure that the driveway could be designed to meet the appropriate <br />standards. <br />Chair Smith remarked she does not see many options available to the Applicant regarding his <br />driveway. <br />Bentrott stated that Gronberg has reviewed his property and suggested that the garage could be • <br />located three to four feet higher, which would require more fill and retaining walls. <br />Van Zomeren commented that the City Engineer has not reviewed that option. <br />Lindquist stated in his opinion that option will not be acceptable either. <br />Bentrott stated he has taken photographs of the surrounding neighborhood depicting their driveways, <br />noting that two of the existing driveways have steeper grades than what is being proposed here. <br />Chair Smith commented she was unsure what the Applicant was referring to, noting that the Planning <br />Commission can only address what is before them with this application. <br />Schroeder commented this is a hard lot to work with, but would not look favorably on a vacation of <br />Bluff Street. <br />Bentrott stated there is history that the City has vacated unopened, platted streets previously. <br />Van Zomeren remarked that the vacation the Applicant is referring to occurred in the 1960s. <br />Lindquist stated the Applicant can request the City Council to vacate Bluff Street. <br />Chair Smith commented even if Bluff Street is vacated, there still are some drainage issues that would <br />need to be addressed. Smith stated the Planning Commission is merely an advisory body to the <br />City Council and they may choose to go a different route. <br />Schroeder suggested the Planning Commission vote on this revised plan, noting that the only way <br />this proposal will v/ork is if Bluff Street is vacated. Schroeder commented the drainage issues with the <br />adjoining property v/ill still need to be addressed. <br />Chair Smith stated the Planning Commission needs to get some direction from the City Council on <br />Bluff Street, noting that the Planning Commission did not look favorably on vacating Bluff Street In the <br />past. <br />Lindquist stated he has a problem with the drainage, but this application needs to move forward. <br />Bentrott commented he would like the Planning Commission to act on this application. <br />Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.