Laserfiche WebLink
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of <br />the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies the requests for <br />rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan amendment on a vote of 5 to 0 based on the following <br />findings of fact: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />The applicant had submitted a request for rezoning the property from RJR-IB two <br />acre rural residential to R-IA one acre residential. The rezoning of the property <br />requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow the property to be <br />developed at greater than two acre density. <br />The application was part of an rt for a 49 lot subdivision and a conditional <br />use permit to permit the property to develop as a Planned Residential <br />Development. <br />The property contains a total of 58.43 acres of land, with 51.89 acres being dry <br />buildable. <br />4. <br />5. <br />On May 23, 1988 the City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2. <br />Amendment 2 was a result of a land use study along the Highway 12 corridor. <br />The area east of Old Crystal Bay Road, north of Highway 12, south of County <br />Road 6 and west of Willow Drive was guided for two acre density single family <br />homes. The Comprehensive Plan states the wetlands and natural vegetation in <br />the area provide an excellent transition between the more intense use planned for <br />the south and single family 2-acre to the north. Utilizing this as a break, the <br />area to the north will remain at the 2-acre rural residential standard. <br />Rezoning the property would not provide an alternative housing style or provide <br />for a housing need not being met. This plan appears to provide the types of <br />housing that would be provided under the existing zoning. <br />Page 2 of 4