11-08-1999 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25.1999 (#2522 Bancor Group, Continued) it is his opinion that rezoning of the property for this type of housing is not the best option f(r the City, noting that it impacts the adjoining properties, an alternate type of housing is not being provided with this development, and there is a lack of open space being prop' ".ed with the subdivision. Newman stated that the plan being presented tonight is different due to the comments of the public and the Planning Commission, noting that the Bancor Group is w illing to address the concerns and desires of the r '■idents of Orono. Newman remarked that he w as not aw are that there w as adequate support for alternate style housing on this site. Maj ir Jabbour commented that he feels tlie City- Council should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan as well as being proactive in identifying the future needs of the community. Jabbour stated that he would be willing to vote on the rezoning issue at this time, but that his preference would be to resubmit this application to the Planning Commission so the proper public process may be followed. Flint commented that in his view the issue of rezoning should be looked at Jointly w ith what the developer is proposing rather than separately. Flint stated that the area is zoned two acres and should not be rezoned until a PRD application is submitted that shows a compelling reason to change the zoning in this area. Newman stated that the poor soil conditions and high water table are two reasons behind the proposed higher density-. Kelley stated that a PRD does make sense for this particular parcel of property. Newman remarked that they have taken numerous steps to develop a plan that would be suitable for this property. Newman inquired whether any portion of the application fees on this application would be refundable if they decide to resubmit a new application. Moorse stated that a portion of the fees may be refundable, noting that he is unaware at this time how much of the application fee has been expended. Mayor Jabbour suggested that a vote on the rezoning be taken, with a new application being submitted that is more in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to deny the portion of Application #2522 dealing with rezoning of the property located at County Road 6 and Willow Drive North based on the recommendation and comments of the Planning Commission, with the portion of the application dealing with the subdivision being tabled at this time, with resubmittal to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. Weinberger stated that this application is also requesting an amendment to the comprehensive plan. Page 6