My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
03-21-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2023 9:59:29 AM
Creation date
4/17/2023 9:58:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />March 13, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 11 of 21 <br /> <br />Since the licensed engineer who designed the retaining walls is not responsible for the site layout in <br />gradient services, I would request that the site civil engineer provide the written assurances that the work <br />was completed based on known industry specifications and building codes for mitigating soil erosion and <br />collapse of the bluffs. So my final comments, this was a massive, massive project. There were many, <br />many dump truck, loads of dirt. I don't question the bluff work itself. I think Joe Valdes and his men did a <br />good job building the wall. It was the method of just tearing away the whole bluff that had everyone <br />concerned and has everyone concerned now. And my concern is that top wall doesn't meet the original <br />top of the bluff. There are the indications that plantings are going to be made. I will say that the wall was <br />built with a combination of dirt and stone behind those walls for good drainage. That is as it should be. <br />I'm concerned, how will those plantings take effect in that type of soil? Certainly, you could add <br />something to make it work. I think everybody tries to do a good job. The method of this one was beyond <br />what we've seen for any lake owner. But that doesn't mean we can't go forward and just make it a bluff <br />and retaining walls such that the neighbors on each side don't have to worry about that bluff falling apart. <br />So you have my condolences on how you want to make your decision. It's tough. I agree. It's very, very, <br />very tough. <br /> <br />Johnson noted that this is a lot for a neighbor. You're a particularly educated on the matter and I'm sorry, <br />you've had to learn this much about it. Thanks for your comments. We'll definitely want to integrate some <br />of your recommendations there to our opinion. But, the other part of this is how we deal with this. How <br />do we deal with contractors that go outside the scope? How as a City do we do this better next time to <br />prevent it for neighbors like you when all you do is live there? <br /> <br />Charles Price, Carol's husband, 2813 Casco Point Road, stated Melanie, you made a great point, that next <br />time an application comes in some questions need to be asked. How is this going to be done? And I think <br />that might have been lacking on this one, because everybody from the City who saw it was very shocked. <br />And just to add another data point on the dump trucks, when we talk dump trucks, these are the kinds <br />used on the interstate highways. They're massive. And the worst day I think it was, you know, we're there <br />pretty much every day, we saw at least seven and maybe eight of these giant dump trucks of dirt getting <br />hauled off. It looked to me like they were bringing in gravel and backfill so the dirt went out and <br />hopefully proper backfill came in, the contractors might be able to clarify that point. He asked to have a <br />photo put back up. This is showing the top of the bluff where it originally was. That really shows where <br />the top of the bluff was from the top of the original bluff where that line is. That goes from one fence post <br />to the other. And that is actually 22 feet from the new top of the bluff, so that gives you a rough idea that <br />they've dished the shoreline back 22 feet from where it used to be. Drainage, we still haven't seen too <br />much about drainage at the Planning Commission. I did ask about it. And Joe did clarify that he has that <br />taken care of, but I'm not sure what that means. And I did talk to Wes today. He's still concerned. He <br />doesn't know, has the drainage been taken care of or has it not?. Wes, on the east side, he did ask about <br />the wall between the two properties, a border wall, if you want to call it that, does that catch water? So the <br />water can't just freely fall from this property to the 2817 property. So he wants that wall to remain of <br />some kind. It doesn't have to be exactly what it is right now. Margaret Martin provided a letter. And she <br />has statements from a professional geotechnical engineer and some of his points are really, really <br />important, I think. He's saying, where's the soil test? The engineer says, here's the wall design and I base <br />my wall design upon internal compound stability, but my design is dependent upon a geotechnical <br />engineer doing soils tests and soil samples, and making sure that the assumptions that I made to design
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.