My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1999 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1999-2016 Agenda Packets - work sessions
>
1999
>
09-23-1999 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:24:40 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:24:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sept. 23 Work Session <br />Page 2 <br />people present (Sector Rep Tom Caswell and Watershed Coordinator Jack Frost) as well as Eric <br />Everson (MCWD Exec Dir.) as to where we are at with the Comp Plan. <br />Mary Hill Smith indicated that considering the grilling that Met Council gave Minnetrista about <br />providing more density, and given that Orono is one ring closer to downtown than Minnetrista, we <br />should expect that Met council will be looking for significant higher density areas in Orono. We <br />didn't get into how many units or at wh?' densities might be an "acceptable" amount. <br />Goals for September 23 Work Session <br />1. Review the revised DRAFT table of contents, advise if anything here seems out of whack. <br />o <br />3. <br />Review DRAFT Parts 1 and 11 and the list of proposed figures, etc. and advise whether there <br />are significant concepts missing that should be added to these mostly introductory sections. <br />Discuss whether you wish to consider additional areas for higher density housing, especially <br />in light of the strong neighborhood support in favor of'staying the course' in the 2-acre zones <br />that was shown at the Bancor public hearing; and consider strategies for meeting Met <br />Council's density goals in light of such local opposition...such as redevelopment in already <br />higher density areas? or ? <br />Topics for future Comp Plan work sessions: <br />Thursday September 7:Stormwater Plan (Bonestroo will be presenting information <br />regarding a development fee structure to fund the capital <br />improvements aspect of the plan) <br />Comp Plan Future Topics for Discussion: <br />1) Transportation Policies and Goals (future road maintenance policies, assessment <br />policies; potential County turnbacks or exchanges; rural road standards; <br />private road standards, etc.) <br />2) Vision for Highway 12 Corridor (post-bypass) <br />3) Parks Plan ( adopt Park Commission's 1997-98 draft plan.or?) <br />4) Historic Prcser> ation (any support for doing this?) <br />1 will be continuing to generate sections of the plan for discussion in the coming weeks and will <br />shoot them off to you as quickly as possible. Please call if you have any questions, any topics you <br />want to pay greater attention to at this point, or have comments on information provided to date.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.