Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 <br />(#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) <br />property as a Planned Residential Development <br />The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of <br />natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD would allow the <br />property to be developed at one unit per acre, with City sewer and water being available to these <br />proposed units. This property could not sustain a rural style development with individual septic <br />systems due to the high water table and soil types present. <br />Weinberger stated that the property to the south may be developed at a slightly higher density, <br />with a two acre density development east of Wllow Drive, a low density residential neighborhood <br />north of County Road 6, and the Orono School Campus to the west This development would serve <br />as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east versus the other <br />land uses to the south and west. The Applicants are proposing a plan that would result in the <br />nearest home being located approximately 225 feet from County Road 6. Several berms are <br />being proposed throughout the development, and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style- <br />homes. <br />Access to this development would be off of V/illow Drive, with no access off of County <br />Road 6. City Staff recommends that the proposed intersection betv/een the development and <br />Shadowood Drive be aligned, whether it's through the extension of the northerly road or the other <br />curb cut being relocated further north, to eliminate traffic turning left. The acces.*j points are <br />proposed to be approximately 200 feat apart. <br />Weinberger staled that standard drainage and utility easements v.ould be required, as well as <br />parkland dedication. Weinberger stated the Applicants could have the option cr donating 8 percent <br />of the land value or designating a portion of the development for trails. <br />Weinberger stated that the hookup costs for City sewer and water v/ill need to be discussed <br />further. Weinberger noted that the City Council has established less restrictive zoning standards <br />for other PROS, including French Creek and Sugarwoods. <br />Lindquist commented that he is hesitant to approve rezoning of this area due to the high density <br />housing that is being proposed. <br />Newman stated that the high density is necessary due to the connection costs for City sewer and <br />water, noting that they have reviev/sd the costs involved in this project and that in order to offset <br />their expenses, upper market housing will need to be constructed in this area. <br />Lindquist inquired v/hether they have calculated the average lot size for this development, <br />Newman replied they have not yet made that calculation. <br />Campion stated that they are contemplating lots that average around a half-acre, with the smallest <br />being one-third acre. <br />Stoddard commented that he would like to see a residential development in this area, but that In <br />his view the City Council may wish to retain the two acre zoning. Stoddard stated he Is unaware of <br />the economics Involved for this development, but that he personally would like to see larger lots. <br />Ns'wman stated that this is an expensive parcel of property to develop, and that not all the <br />residences will be constructed with v/alkouts. <br />Page 11