My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
10-25-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:23:16 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:20:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ingthe <br />North, <br />a Class II <br />lecting <br />Date of Application: 10/26/98 <br />Date Complete: 10/26/98 <br />60 day limit: 12/26/98 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: November 18,1998 <br />1 Avenue, <br />Id Lot <br />LUTION <br />)ie Drive, <br />keshore <br />(lENT- <br />Approving <br />iys2, <br />TKLAN <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Liz Van Zomeren <br />Title City Planner <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:nm Paul R. Phillips <br />2140 Sixth Avenue North <br />Class II Preliminary Subdivision <br />Zoning District: RR-IB <br />4.5 acres <br />One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) <br />Application:The applicant is proposing to divide his 4.5 acre homestead parcel into <br />two lots. Each lot would contain 2.0 acres served by a .5 acre outlot. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: <br />The Planning Commission recommended on a 5-2 to approve the preliminary plat. The majority <br />opinion felt that the proposed subdivision met the intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinance <br />and that a cul-de-sac was not necessary based on the location of the existing residences and <br />driveway. The minority opinion was concerned about the lack of a cul-de-sac and whether the <br />rear lot should e considered a backlot which would require increased setbacks and a lot area of <br />3 acres for th' existing residence. <br />Please note that the Planning Commission did not have the benefit of the Police Chiefs viewpoint <br />which was received 11-18-98, after the Planning Commission meeting. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: <br />To adopt or amend the attached resolution. <br />Attachments
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.