My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
10-25-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:23:16 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:20:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26,1998 <br />(#2430 Paul Phillips, Continued) <br />Goetten inoveHrPetersoa.5ecoi^d, tosenjLAppKc9lIoirM430,2140 Sixth Avenue <br />North, back to the Planmofr€oniTffmion!^M review. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />-(#13) #2431 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD-VARIANCE <br />RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4185 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2431,815 Partenwood Road, <br />and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4185. VOTE* Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />14) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 4755/4775 BAYSTDF ROAD <br />EASEMENT/SUBDIVISION <br />Laurie Lurdeen, Grjenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg, were present. <br />Van Zomeren sfa^d the Applicants are requesting a revision or amendmmt to the final plat <br />resolution to accommodate a private driveway easement over Lot 3 to^ovide access to <br />Lot 1. The private driveway easement does not comply with the ap^val resolution for the <br />final plat, which shows ahNOutlot for all three lots along Bayside Ro^. Van Zomeren stated <br />Staff is generally not in favoKpf private driveway easements due/o the possible problems that <br />may result. <br />The Planning Commission recommend«l denial of a private easement and suggested that the <br />Applicant apply for a lot line rearrangembqt, which woi^ require a lot width variance for <br />Lot 3. <br />Jim DeBerg, 1551 Hunter Lane, Medina, stated hi^^d previously met with the property <br />owner and offered the private driveway easem^ norr^lizing that it was in conflict with <br />what was originally approved in the Resoluti^. DeBergttated hv was later informed by the <br />building official that he could not have a pwate driveway elsement. <br />Laurie Lundeen stated they were unaw^c they could not grant a private driveway easement. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the City doe^ot officially recognize a private drivbway easement. <br />DeBerg remarked that even witl^the granting of the private driveway easemenCtfie lot still <br />exceeds the minimum lot size <br />Van Zomeren stated a lot^dth variance would be needed in the case of a lot line <br />rearrangement for the middle lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.