My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
09-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:07:39 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 4:04:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999 <br />(»3) M2308 BROOK PARK REALTY^ 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - Continued <br />Gaffron said if it is the Council ’s intent that it be a public trail and the developer does not <br />object, the easement could be incorporated. <br />Gleason said he did not object. <br />Gaffron said the subdivider’s bank will not have the letter of credit ready for another week <br />and the City has not received payment of the required fees for final plat, legal review/filing, <br />park dedication, or sewer & water. He recommended that any approval granted tonight should <br />be conditioned on not filing the plat until the City Attorney is satisfied with the title policy <br />and all other conditions are met. <br />Jabbour questioned the $53,162 fee for sewer and water. <br />Gaffron said this property was assessed 30 years ago for sewer and 20 years ago for water as <br />commercial property. They paid a premium price then and never goi eny of that money back <br />so they receive a credit. They are being assessed the difference between what they paid for a <br />number of units in the past and the current number of units under the current ordinance. <br />Jabbour asked if the City is assessing the developer for the water treatment plant assessment. <br />Gaffron said he would review the matter because he was not sure if that assessment was <br />applied to this property because vacant properties were not assessed. <br />Jabbour explained that an assessment of $350 per home was made for rehabilitation of the <br />water treatment plant. <br />Gleason asked if it could be tied to the building permit or if it had to be assessed to the <br />property. <br />Gaffron said he believes it was assessed to properties that had a residence structure on them <br />and was not assessed to vacant properties. <br />Gleason said he would prefer to pay the fee up front. <br />Flint referred to the last three paragraphs on page 4 of the prior resolution regarding the <br />lawsuit and said they should be included in the final approval resolution in case anyone else <br />tries to use this as a precedent. <br />Gaffron 'lid he initially put the paragraphs in the draft, but after discussions with the City <br />Attorney, he look them out. <br />Jabbour asked Mr. Barrett whether the paragraphs should be included. <br />Page 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.