Laserfiche WebLink
• fc*. <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETTTTO <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 <br />(#3 James'^nckens, continued) <br />Jabbour said heW abstain if the matter is re-opened. <br />• ^ ^ • .* *• *••• *• • . • • - • <br />•: Flint explained his opi^n that access to the property shoi^db^om Crystal Creek Road. ; <br />Kelley said there should noh»e any discussion on this)p^r if it wiU be re-opened because <br />the nei^bors have not been notified. <br />Flint moved, Kellnr seconded, a ^on t^i^pen #2466 for James Renckens and Jota <br />Winston, 3020 Watertown Road - Piat Appiication and table the matter for <br />trro Tf'ccks. <br />Jabbour asked if the appUcants^;v^d object^^ matter being tabled for two weeks. <br />Winston said they have mptwth staff .and they arX^g to continue to work wiA staff. <br />They are willing to pw^ne it for two weeks and worfcs^wth staff in the interim. They would <br />like to have it re-oneded. <br />Sansevere said4hat Renckens told him that at the Aprii 12th i^tiM, &e CouncU lecdved <br />misinform^m and there were some inaccurate comments made.thaMji^t that mi^t have <br />affected^M \yay the Council members .voted. ■ . ’ <br />and Peterson abstaingdA <br />(#4) #2477 GEORGE W. STICKNEY, 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />George Stickney, applicant, and Mark Gronberg were present <br />Weinberger presented the staff leport He said the applicant has proposed an «^t lot <br />touted ^the'^^-dSd^le f^y rwMmUd di^ two-Kte tot size. <br />He ^d staff was presented a new plan today regardmg the NURP pond m relation to the <br />wetland delineaUon r^rt The NUBP pond was to be located on Lot 5. It u proP'^'l *» “* <br />moved to Lot 2. Staff is concerned that a NURP pond in that area <br />fiom the entire site which is the intent of the NURP poni Since recei^ <br />the proposai, fliere has not been time for the Oty Engineer to rewew the plan ^ toage <br />ealcdaSons have not been deUvered to the City. Weinberger said fhd &e Qty Engme« <br />should have an opportunity to review the plan, especially since it will mvolw propo« <br />culverts and othefW of pipi"«**Weinl^rget <br />issue regarding whether the entire wetland area should be considered agai^ tot ““ <br />the Type 1 and 2 wetiands are an extension of the Orono wetlands. Weinberger said tiiat the <br />Page 4