07-26-1999 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Issues for Discussion . . • * • • • * •* . ; •. ’ vl.. Tlie vegetation proposed is not consistent with the types that were removed witiiout obtaining • • .1, a perirdt and me not compatible with.the vegetotipn on surroimding properties.-iThe.Code , ' states no' live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six inches or more shall * be removed without first obtaining a permit firom the City. A requirement of the permit is at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the Staff, Planning Commission and Ci^ Council be planted. 2. 3. '4. The landscape plan does not address tree replacement on the interior portion of the lot along tile lakeshore and near the residence. The m^ority of the plantings witiiin tiie slope are smaller shrub style plantings. No mature trees have been proposed that would help to screen the residence from public water view. • • The applicants should provide reidsed hardcover calculations for tiie 75*250' lake^oie setback and the 250-500'lake^ore setback. RECOMMENDATION Stasis recommending denial of the landscaping plan. The plan'does not address the lyp^ and dzes of trees removed. The plan shoitid include plantings of mature basswood/oak and maple trees throughout the lot, e^ecially along the lakeshore and on the hillside. §2492 KekpndQattxcelch 2490 Old Bteeh Read Aft*' 4ht Feet Varfanets end Conditional Vst PtrmU Sfn/99 faff A