Laserfiche WebLink
• •• - <br />ORONO PLANNING COIVDVnSSION <br />.. MONDAY, JUNE 2]L, 1999. <br />• .! <br />• • • • 1 <br />(#2497 GAIL BRINER, CONTINUED) ■ . • • • <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to.recommend approval of Application #2497,i760 <br />• ' 'iTT^ynnrl fnnd,t>rAppiirantto rebulldan existi ng rot^ag-4^eXT>inq^ . <br />•• grant a l5<Shor|i«iiteci^ to allov/ the pm£o§fid-d«crEo^e located Y/»thm ' <br />76* of the lakeshore 'arStogra«t»^idco^^ allow 673 square feet of hardcover <br />In the 0-76 ’ lakeshore setbackargsiJT^rmTrthe-c^^ ' <br />to the rock and plasticjjBtfer^Iiie^ being removedufRlw4ha4wk and plastic removed <br />from undeMhaitfggtFiat Is not under the deck. VOTE: Ayes 6, <br />OLD BUSINESS, CONTINUED ' <br />• • • . , • <br />(#2) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT _ <br />VARIANCE "■ * <br />AND’CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />■ • * • ’ . • • <br />. Reznlck staled that they would like the Planning Commission to vole on this appliwtion tonight. <br />Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of <br />Beach Road, for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permtt * <br />and recommend tq the City Council that the Applicant and the Applicant s <br />Architect meet with the City ’s Forester In order to revise a new *® j5f?®P® o* <br />consideration by.the City Council which Is more In accordance ^th the ^commendations oi <br />. ..the City.Forester In order.to allow this Item to be expedited. VOTE; AyeS 4. Nays Z, <br />Smith and Berg Opposed. <br />Smith staled she was opposed to this application due to the lack <br />Planning Commission to the City Council on the revised landscape plan that Is to be suhmmea. <br />Berg stated that the Planning Corhmlsslon should vole on the plan that Is to be presented to the <br />City Council. <br />**'• . <br />lUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED <br />#5) #2499T?t05A^ AND MARILYN SWANSON, 1740 SHADYWOOD RQ^pVAlTlANCES, <br />8:03 p.m.-8:16 p.i <br />• .• <br />• u <br />The Certificate of Mailing and'Xffid^lt of’PubllcaUqn were not <br />Thomas and Marilyn Swanson, Appllcanls^wqI;e pr <br />Gaffron staled the Applicants are proposIijgriSaMei^nslq^^^^ fS!?crrin?ind^^ dovm <br />In the late fall. The screen encb»!feand existing ®f® Soever the hardcoversetback. The structural coyprdgewould Increase wHh the screen pZirctL how , <br />amount does not changpr <br />Gaffron staledtodfaUkeshore setback variance Is required to allow <br />an exlsllngd^o be located within 75’ of the lakeshore and a ^a^^ver ^ <br />square todUr 21.5 percent, In the 0-75* lakeshore setback area where zero percent is auow <br />Page 8 <br />• .* <br />. ■ % <br />• • • •