My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
07-26-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 8:42:14 AM
Creation date
4/13/2023 8:38:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COliMrii m«=eT»NQ <br />JUL 2 6 1999 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CUYUh OrtONO <br />Date: July 21,1999 <br />Item No.: <br />Department Approval:Aditfinistrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. GafTron <br />Title: Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2490 - C larles & Sue Van Eeckhout, 120 Brovvn Road South - Sketch Plan <br />Property Area: <br />Zoning: <br />Gross = 20 acres ± Dr>'Buildable = 12-14 acres ± <br />RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre minimum, not in MUSA <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - 7/7/99 Staff Memo <br />B - 6/18/99 Applicant's Letter <br />C - 5/12/99 Sketch Plan Memo and Exhibits <br />D - 5/17/99 Planning Commission Minutes <br />Applicant requests Council direction in regard to potential rezoning of this site to allow higher density <br />housing. A separate but related issue is whether or not Council would support developing this property <br />with sewer, regardless whether it is rezoned. A third topic for discussion is whether Council believes <br />the site has unique characteristics that support development via Planned Residential Development <br />(PRD). <br />Staff has suggested this might be a potential site for mitigating some of the Long Lake housing that will <br />be eliminated by the Highway 12 bypass (See Exhibit A). <br />Planning Commission reviewed this sketch plan at their May meeting. Applicant was provided with <br />only minimal direction because Planning Commission felt that the primary issues of rezoning and <br />development with sewer were better addressed at the Council level. <br />Please review the Staff memo and exhibits of 5/12/99 for information about the site and applicants' <br />proposed development. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTFD <br />Review the above noted topics and provide applicant with direction as to whether a PRD is feasible, <br />whether the site might be developed with sewer, and whether a rezoning will have any support. <br />Applicant has been advised that a formal rezoning application with public hearing and neighborhood <br />notification may be the most appropriate method of determining whether rezoning is feasible.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.