My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-1999 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1999-2016 work sessions
>
1999
>
06-03-1999 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:52:55 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:52:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attachment <br />Page 2 <br />systems not meeting a 3’ seasonal water table separation. It was determined that perhaps as many <br />as 60% of the existing systems in Orono would not conform to the standard, and would eventually <br />have to be replaced. <br />During the latter half of the 1990's the City worked aggressively to bring sewer to the "Hot Spots" <br />neighbor!toods. This seemed more prudent than forcing homeowners to construct new mound septic <br />systems on sites that in many cases were marginal due to soils, topography and available space. <br />Most of the 10 "Hot Spots" have been sewered, or are expected to be in the next two years. <br />One of the results of solving these scattered neighborhood problems, has been the creation of a <br />MUSA boundary that has multiple inroads and islands. There are few portions of the Rural Area that <br />are more than a mile from the nearest sewer. This can lead residents to the perception that sewer is <br />'just around the corner’. <br />The 1980 CMP did not specifically set a goal of providing sewer to the entire shoreline of Lake <br />Minnetonka. However, the current Council appears to be of a single mind that this should occur. <br />A prime example is the 1998 MUSA amendment that allowed the 7-lot Little Orchard subdivision <br />to be sewered, and brought the entire northeast shore of Maxwell Bay into the MUSA. <br />One of the (perhaps not anticipated) side effects of low-density zoning has been the gradual <br />'gentrification' of Rural Orono. While the 1980 CMP states that "Orono's rural areas provide the <br />opportunity for low density housing at affordable prices...", opportunities for 'affordable' rural <br />housing have dwindled due to skyrocketing land values. In Orono's rural area (2-acre and 5-acre <br />zones only), 21 new homes were constructed in 1998. The range in construction values for these 21, <br />not including land costs or landscaping, ranged from $185,000 to $1,597,000. 14 of 21 exceeded <br />$300,000 construction value. The average construction value was $452,000 which likely translates <br />to a selling price around $550,000. <br />The point here is that as a higher percentage of the rural area is developed with housing cf high <br />value, a greater percentage of rural property owners may be willing to accept the high cost of sewer <br />in order to not have to deal with septic problems. This will lead to pressure to retrofit 2-acre <br />conforming lots with sewer for neighborhoods that are willing to pay for it. And then perhaps it's <br />only a short leap to the idea that we might actually develop 2-acre neighborhoods with sewer from <br />the very start. Met Council policies notwithstanding. <br />Over tlie last 20 years the urb«n spiral ha^ apparently been held at bay, and we haven’t been forced <br />to become Plymouth. This could be attributed to a progression of City Councils who refused to <br />tezone the rural area while watching it develop at a slow, steady pace. It also could be attributed to <br />a market that eats up new 2-acre developments as quick as they are created, apparently indicating <br />that the "rural" lifestyle Orono provides is an attractive one.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.