My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:31 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999 <br />4 <br />(#2499 THOMAS AND MARILYN SWANSON, CONTINUED)consideration by the Planning Commission is determinina when something becomes permanent as opposed to temporary. oeiermining <br />frck^rinrinnllff ^ould like to assemble this screen porch to allow them to sit on their <br />Smith stated In her opinion this structure should be considered permanent. <br />Gaffron noted that City Code does not permit structures within the 0-75 ’ lakeshore setback. <br />Lindquist commented that this structure should be treated as permanent. <br />rn"!lil«no o® ^re Slightly over on their hardcover amount but that structural <br />'0 «f«"9 more structure In the <br />Smith Inquired whether there was other hardcover that could be removed In that area. <br />Mrs. Swanson slated that the dog house and concrete pad has been removed. <br />Swanson noted that the contractor does charge a small lee for removing and Installing the screens. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith move^ Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2499 1740 <br />dlr?*« variance to allow a 10’ by 17' screen porch on an existing <br />allow 1 973 souare felt of tf ? lakeshore and to grant a hardcover variance to <br />sQurreVeet ^ af ^ in the 0.75* lakeshore setback area where zero <br />® ® Wf'tlei'standing that future applications for additional <br />upon bv^he Pkannlnn r setback, on this property will not be looked favorablyupon by the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Lindquist Opposed. <br />i?thet^ySrcl?nri?fS^^^^ fPP'i?^«0" Peca^^se It increases the structural hardcover <br />Srnllar appIlM^ consistent with previous votes by the Planning Commission on <br />commission Is allowing this stmcture lo remain on a <br />Page 9 <br />j:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.