My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:31 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The District is exploring ways to make the management of the District’s resources more cost <br />efficient. On Friday, March 12,1999, the District hosted a round table discussion with city <br />managers and public works staff. The information which resulted from this meeting should help <br />the District better define its leadership role in policy development and fiscal accountability. <br />the attendees suggested the District should develop cost sharing options, define system-wide <br />versus local watershed functions and develop appropriate cost-benefit analyses to determine <br />whom should pay and how much they should pay. In other words, the District should reexamine <br />its policy of funding all projects on an ad valorem basis. <br />O ther Recommendations <br />The BWSR report also contained two recommendations directed to the Commissioners and the <br />cities within the District. First, the Commissioners should establish, in coordination with cities <br />and other District constituents, a set of “guiding principles and standards” for selecting and . <br />reviewing the performance of District managers. Second, cities, which have not already done so, <br />should designate a technical and policy representative to act as liaison with the District. <br />The District and Cities have largely addressed the second of these recommendations. However, <br />the first recommendation has remains undeveloped. The Commissioners, as the appointing and <br />recalling authority for the District’s board of managers, have a clear leadership role in monitoring <br />the effective management of water and related land resources in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District and in the other watershed management organizations in Hennepin County. It was in this <br />capacity that the Commissioners acted, when in September of 1997 they requested the BWSR <br />revdew the District’s activities. <br />The Commissioners would benefit from the establishment of a way to measure the success of the <br />District board or an individual manager. The BWSR again recommends that the Commissioners <br />develop a set of standards and a performance review procedure for the selection, appointment and <br />reappointment of watershed district managers in Hennepin County. Performance measures might <br />include interviews with District, City and County staff that work with the District board or <br />manager on a regular basis, re^^ew of manager per diem and other individual expenses, review of <br />the cost effectiveness of District programs by independent audit or any number of other indices <br />the Commissioners feel would be useful in adding their decision-making. <br />June 15,1999 <br />BWSR Report to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners <br />on the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Page 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.