My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
07-12-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:31 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BWSR Report to the <br />Hennepin County Board of Conunissioners <br />on the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />June 15, 1999 <br />On September 23,1997 the H- nnepin County Board of Commissioners (Commissioners) <br />requested the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) review the activities of the Minnehaha <br />Creek Watershed District (District) to determine whether the activities were in compliance with <br />State statutes, rules and regulations. The original report was prepared and delivered to the <br />Comnussioners on January 26, 1998. <br />While the report found the District was in compliance with State statutes, rules and regulations, it <br />also contained several recommendations for the District. In summary, the BWSR recommended <br />the District review its activities in the following areas. <br />1.D istrict Management . <br />The District board of managers should: <br />A. shift their management style from being involved in the details of District <br />operations toward policy and oversight activities. <br />B. empower District staff to carry out most of the operational functions and <br />administrative functions of the District. <br />C. rely more on staff in the areas of permits and planning. <br />2.DISTRICT C ommunication , Outreach and C oordination . <br />The District board of managers should: <br />A. improve communications with its constituents, especially cities. <br />B. host an annual meeting with its constituent cities and counties to discuss capital <br />improvement projects and to try to achieve broad agreement among the parties <br />on sources of funding for the projects. <br />3.D istrict Financial A ccountability . <br />The District board of managers should: <br />A. consider using additional engineering firms or the Hennepin Conservation <br />District for capital improvement project design. <br />B. consider using city engineers as project managers on capital improvement <br />projects. <br />Although reports like the above tend to focus on areas of District activity which may require some <br />improvement, the BWSR report also found the District’s managers, staff and consultants to be a <br />highly dedicated and committed group working together to protect and manage water and related <br />land resources of the District. As with the first report, District staff and managers have willing <br />cooperated with the BWSR to complete this follow-up report.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.