My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
06-28-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:42:34 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:37:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />(»9) U2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CL UB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLA T <br />APPROVAL - Continued <br />understanding that the Council is comfortable, the minute we have that in hand, that you, from <br />our point of view, could be issued a certificate of occupancy and a conditional use permit. His <br />feeling is that there should be a meeting and Crosby could prepare some modification to the <br />document based on tonight’s discussion. <br />Crosby asked if there were any other specific concerns. <br />Jabbour asked if the light on the equipment shed had been fixed. <br />Gappa said there was some concern about the light spillage from the maintenance shed. <br />Crosby reviewed the issues with the trail. <br />Flint moved, Kelly seconded, a motion to table the Plat of Spring Hill Golf Club File No. <br />2480. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#10) #2484 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4305 <br />Kelley removed himself for this item. <br />Jabbour said a revised resolution has been drafted for the Conditional Use Permit. The <br />resolution must be reviewed to see if it reflects the understanding reached on May 24. <br />Bruce Malkerson, 901 Marquette, referred to page 6 of the revised resolution, paragraph 7. <br />He asked that the words “and they shall be completed before opening of the access” be added <br />to the first sentence. Under 7.B., the 10 MPH speed limit signs should also be on Woodhill <br />Avenue. Under 7.D,. he said they understood there would be two sets of speed bumps on <br />Woodhill Avenue. The way the language is drafted, speed bumps do not have to be installed. <br />Under 7.C., they want uniform traffic signs for the ‘Do Not Enter ” sign on the public right-of- <br />way. <br />Jabbour said he did not understand that there would be speed bumps on Woodhill Avenue. <br />Sansevere said it was his understanding that speed bumps would be put on Woodhill Avenue. <br />Jabbour said the whole thing is Woodhill Avenue, but he understood the only place they were <br />going to put speed bumps is in the area they are building, not in the existing street. <br />Malkerson said that was not his understanding. <br />Page 18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.