My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
05-24-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:35:44 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:29:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Date: 4/1/99 <br />Completion Date: 4/1/99 <br />60 Day Deadline: 5/31/99 <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />MAY 2 4 1999 <br />C/i nr OH Oho/vo <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 5/20/99 <br />ITEM NO <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Wendy Bottenberg <br />Title Planning Intern <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2169 Michael Renard <br />1185 Tonkawa Road <br />Variance-Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) <br />Lot Area:32,648 s.f. or approx. .75 acres <br />Application: The applicant seeks approval of a variance addition in revising the structural <br />amount already approved in a 75'-250' hardcover variance approved in 1996 (File #2169). The <br />applicant is proposing to remove an existing shed and its associated hardcover and replacing it with <br />a larger shed. The existing shed is currently located 2.36' from the property line, the new shed will <br />be located 10.36' from the property line (no longer in side yard setback). <br />This application requires the following variance approval: <br />1.Variance from Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 : To permit a variance addition to change the <br />structure amount approved in hardcover variance to allow for a 12' x 21' shed to be located <br />in the 75"-250' setback area. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: <br />The Planning Commission recommended by a 4 to 0 vote to: <br />Deny the application as presented for reasons noted below: <br />1. There is no hardship inherit in the land to build a larger accessory building. <br />i <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.