My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
05-24-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:35:44 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:29:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
«• • • <br />• • •WINSTON LAW OFFICE r <br />April 14,1999 <br />Richard N. Flint <br />Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett, PA <br />33 South Sixth Street, #3400 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402-3796 <br />RE: James R. Renckens Subdivision Application <br />Dear Dick: <br />Jim Renckens and I wish to thank you for giving us a sympathetic ear on <br />Monday evening. While you ultimately voted against us on the rear outlot issue, it <br />was clear to us that you were making every effort to understand and be sympathetic <br />with our position. We believe, rightly or wrongly, that, had Charlie Kelly not spoken <br />so adamantly against us, we would have been able to proceed without the outlot. <br />Now, with the rear outlot requirement imposed, I am not sure that Jim Renckens will <br />buy the property, and I would hate to lose him as a neighbor and resident of the City <br />of Orono. I hope to talk to Charlie Kelly in the near future. I have known Charlie <br />for a number of years and he is a friend. I was somewhat taken aback that he spoke <br />so adamantly against us. <br />In any event, thank you for giving us a fair hearing on Monday night. I am <br />sorry your vote supported the imposition of the outlot. In view of the outcome, I <br />have some concern that I did not effectively advocate my client’s position, a position <br />which I support, being a resident of the same neighborhood myself. <br />We are not opposed to working cooperatively wth the City where public <br />works are for the benefit of the corrunimity or the particular neighborhood in <br />question. Here, we feel strongly that the creation of a street would be of great <br />detriment to the neighborhood and of no real benefit to the City. The creation of the <br />outlot along the Northerly edge of the Stubbs/Renckens property devalues the same, <br />and has immediate adverse impacts on the Crystal Creek neighborhood, and <br />particidarly Lots 6 and 7. The thought that this outlot might at some future date be <br />linked to the street in front of my house, and that the street in front of my house <br />might be linked to a street serving properties to my West and North is of such alarm <br />and concern to me that I have been distressed ever since I walked out of City Hall <br />Monday night. <br />This has not been a good week. I am deeply concerned that Mr. Renckens %vill <br />now not purchase the property, and I wanted to have him as a neighbor and as a <br />resident of the City of Orono. I am as distressed about the possible future loss of <br />safety, securitv and privacy \vith the possible linkage of Wear Lane to other roads to <br />4420 IDS Cenler, SO Soulk 8lk Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612/341-9800 Fax: 612/338-6351 <br />i <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.