Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I» <br />c <br />I <br />r <br />♦ • <br />I I <br />i <br />! : <br />assessment: i.e. the price they received for the sale of the land. They <br />were simply spending money to make money. <br />According to the Club's own estimate, of 50-60 cars, each travelling <br />back and fo. ih, for the proposed hours of operation, opening the road <br />would mean an additional car travelling down Woodhill Avenue EVERY 6 <br />MINUTES. The Club's estimates are wholly unsubstantiated and one <br />wonders why they have fought so hard to gain access to a road that <br />they say few people would use. We believe their estimates to be <br />dramatically low. Woodhill Avenue, at it's substandard width is wholly <br />inadequate to handle this overwhelming increase in traffic. The City <br />must consider the danger this will pose to all users of Woodhill Avenue <br />as well as potential liability exposure should someone get hurt. <br />OPENING THE BACK ROAD WILL PRESENT THE SAME VANDALISM <br />AND SAFETY CONCERNS AS WERE REALIZED IN 1978 <br />In 1978, the Club closed the road voluntarily because of fears of <br />vandalism and neighbors' complaints about speeding cars. There is no <br />eason to belive that this will not repeot itself. <br />EQUITY CONCERNS <br />DUE TO ITS OWN ACTIONS, THE CLUB HAS CREATED A CHANGE <br />OF CIRCUMSTANCES THAT NECESSITATES REVOKING THEIR <br />1969 CUP AND RE-ISSUING IT WITHOUT THE BACK ENTRANCE <br />The club asserts that their 1969 Conditional use permit gives them <br />the right to use the back entrance onto Woodhill Avenue. Their <br />contention seems to rest on the inclusion of a hand drawn map included <br />with their 1969 CUP application. However, this map was not <br />referenced in the CUP, and is therefore only part of the club's <br />application- not the granted CUP. The club admits this in their current <br />I <br />•r