Laserfiche WebLink
■J.«»■■ UU^ -y^'' tvz -r^ . <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />u <br />n <br />‘ 'i <br />S'- : 1 <br />u <br />^ ; i <br />f : ! <br />t' i <br />i <br />, i <br />LJ <br />n <br />L <br />that the public had the right to use Woodhill Avenue from Orono Orchard Road easterly <br />to the Woculhill Countr>' Club property line and that the entire length of Woodhill Avenue <br />up to the Woodhill Country Club property line was a public street. At no time did 1 ever <br />object to or try to restrict use of Woodhill Avenue by the public. <br />7. When I purchased my house in 1946, there were only three driveways that <br />used Woodhill Avenue: the two homes at the corner of Orono Orchar;? Road and <br />Woodhill Country Club, in the late 1950's or early I960's, a house was built on the north <br />side of Woodhill Avenue fuilhcr cast. On August 14, 1979,1 sent the attached letter <br />(Exhibit D) to the Village of Orono. Orono responded to me by acknowledging that <br />Woodhill Avenue was a public street, that it had been and was maintained by Orono. and <br />that the vehicles were illegally blocking a public street. A copy of the August 17. 1979 <br />letter I received from the City of Orono is attached as E.xhibit E. The same day the Orono <br />police chief wrote to Mr. Wagencr and advised him to remove his trucks so that Woodhill <br />Avenue could be used as a public street by the public. A copy of the letter is attached as <br />Exhibit F. <br />S. I understand the current position ol the City of Orono is that the portion ol <br />Woodhill Avenue cast of Mr. Wagoner’s driveway up to the Woodhill Country Club <br />property line is simply a “private casement” over my property. The City’s position is <br />incorrect. At all times during my ownership, 1 did not consider that portion of Woodhill <br />Avenue to be a private casement on my property in favor of Woodhill Country Club. As I <br />Doc» I07I26.SM <br />•i