My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
05-10-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 3:34:20 PM
Creation date
4/12/2023 3:27:45 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Date: 3-25-99 <br />Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 <br />60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members <br />Michael P. GafFron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />April 14, 1999 <br />Subject: #2482 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Guest House CUP <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Ovviiers List <br />D - Site Plans (Original and Proposed) <br />E - Letter of Request <br />F - Excerpt from Resolution No. 3902 <br />Background <br />At the time of CUP application for the Golf Club, plans showed the existing Spring Hill caretaker <br />house (the old farmhouse overlooking Spring Hill Road, and just southwest of the new clubhouse) <br />likely to be removed, since it appeared to conflict with the 5th tee. It also was shown on those <br />drawings in dashed lines, suggesting it was to be removed. <br />As a result, the language of Resolution No. 3902 listed all accessory buildings approved for the <br />property and did not include the caretaker house or its two associated outbuildings (see Exhibit F). <br />In January 1998 the Club requested and was granted approval to construct an entirely new clubhouse <br />rather than remodeling the old conference center. The location of the clubhouse did not change, and <br />the new site plan did not extend westward far enough to inkle to statf that the caretaker house was <br />intended to remain. <br />In summer 1998 the Club was allowed to connect the caretaker house to the clubhouse septic system, <br />the Building Department staff being unaw are that it was not an 'approved' building. This came to <br />my attention this winter when Club Manager Tim Ivory requested a separate address for the <br />caretaker house. Condition 3 of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment of the CUP if <br />additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a 'guest house', the caretaker <br />house also requires a Guest House CUP.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.