Laserfiche WebLink
CMP Part 1. Introduction <br /> <br /> <br /> City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />OVERVIEW <br /> <br />The basic concerns and philosophies of Orono citizens have evolved through the City's history and <br />its intimate ties with Lake Minnetonka. <br /> <br />Map No. 1-1 locates Orono in relationship to Minneapolis and the western suburbs. More importantly, it <br />clearly indicates the relative importance of Orono to the total watershed of Lake Minnetonka. No other <br />city bordering the Lake has as much water area, as much shoreline, or as much watershed land area as <br />Orono. Orono is committed to effective land use planning and permanent environmental protection in an <br />effort to preserve the great resources of Lake Minnetonka for the benefit of all regional residents. <br /> <br />The people of Orono, though of diverse interests, have been drawn together by a slow-paced lifestyle and <br />quiet amenities. Their common tie is a commitment to maintain those attractions of which Lake <br />Minnetonka is the most visible example. <br /> <br />In the 1950's, increasing urbanization all around Lake Minnetonka threatened to environmentally "kill" <br />the Lake by uncontrolled discharge of nutrients. Citizens became concerned. Their first reaction caused <br />lake area municipalities to begin extending sewer systems to eliminate individual septic system <br />discharges. This helped the situation at first, but by 1968 lake water quality was still diminishing. Citizens <br />became alarmed. <br /> <br />At this point the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency joined with the newly organized Lake Minnetonka <br />Conservation District to commission a study of lake pollution. Entitled "A Program for Preserving the <br />Quality of Lake Minnetonka", the "Harza Study" (as it will be referred to hereafter) found that this nutrient <br />input, particularly phosphorus, was being generated from two principal sources: the seven municipal <br />sewage treatment plants; and urban stormwater runoff coming from within the watershed. <br /> <br />The first pollution source, nutrient rich effluent outflowing from the municipal sewage treatment plants, <br />was systematically eliminated during the late 1970's and early 1980's by multi-million dollar construction <br />of sewer interceptors designed to remove effluent from the watershed. But stormwater runoff is a different <br />matter. Compared to point-source sewage pollution, the collection and treatment of non- point source <br />stormwater runoff is relatively difficult, costly, and often impractical. <br /> <br />Lake Minnetonka is fed by neither spring nor tributary. The sole replenishment comes from storm water <br />runoff from the watershed, of which over one-third flows from or through Orono. Lake Minnetonka, <br />second only to Lake Michigan in this region, has an extremely long 25-year flush-out period. This means <br />that careful and continuous attention must be given to the quality of runoff into the Lake. The various <br />studies conducted in the 1960's and 1970's recommended that lakeshore density be limited and that <br />the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only <br />practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from storm water runoff. <br /> <br />Implementation of density limitations relies on breaking the "Urbanization Spiral", the development <br />paradox that results from providing urban-level municipal services for new development. The paradox is <br />that if municipal services are extended into rural zones, the cost of these services taxes the land to the <br />point that higher density development is required. Particularly in the case of sewers, even if extended to