My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 4:20:07 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 4:14:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 <br />(its) #24S7 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERQ^ 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES <br />Continued <br />Julie and Mark VerSteege, neighbors to the north, said they want to make sure the runoff stays on <br />the applicant’s property, and does not drain Into their basement. <br />Mabusth asked If the applicants have submitted a grading plan. <br />Van Zomeren said the plan was submitted to Tom Kellogg, the City Engineer. He said to make sure <br />silt control fences are used. The City Engineer’s first review did not flag any rtajor concerns. <br />Mabusth asked If the surveyor has confirmed that there Is no average lakeshore setback problem. <br />Van Zomeren said yes. <br />Hawn asked If the applicants have looked at reducing the structural coverage by 40 square feet <br />David LIndberg said they are willing to reduce the structural coverage. <br />McMillan questioned the detached garage. <br />Undberg said an attached garage would require a larger driveway and additional grading. <br />McMillan suggested repositioning the garage In order to reduce the slope and Improve safety. <br />Mabusth questioned why the O’Keefe application was so much lower in hardcover In the 75'*^250’ <br />setback. <br />LIndberg said the O'Keefe’s had more driveway and a smaller garage. <br />Mabusth asked how the other commission members felt about the hardcover In the 75 ’-250’ setback. <br />Hawn said this is a difficult sHe. She would like to see the structural coverage reduced by 40 square <br />feet. <br />Mabusth asked staff to review the variances that would be needed with the oirrent plan. <br />Van Zomeren said they would need a variance for the 0’>75 ’ setback on the south side, a variance in <br />the 75 ’-250* setback to allow 33% where 25% Is allowed, a conditional use permit for grading within <br />five feet of the property line and restoration of the topography. <br />McMillan asked about the O’Keefe’s plan and what the amount of hardcover was In the 75 ’-250’. <br />Van Zomeren said it was 5,725 square feet. <br />Mabusth asked if the garage design would match the house. <br />Undberg said the garage would match the house. <br />Mabusth said the Commission would have a problem approving 33% hardcover In the 75 ’-250’ <br />setback. She asked about the hardcover that would result from the porches. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the square footage of the hardcover. She said they would need to reduce <br />1.000 square feet to meet the 25% requirement. <br />Pages <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.