Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 <br />£X <br />(U$) it24S4 GREG AND MARCIA BARNUM, ISO MCCULLEY ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued <br />White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2454 for Greg and <br />Marcia Bamum, 160 McCuiiey Road, for an after-the-fact conditional use permit for land <br />alternation subject to: . <br />1. Review of the sepdc sites to ensure that they were riot disturbed. <br />2. Determine an end date for the stock pile. <br />3. Change the address to a number on Bayside Road (4760). <br />4. Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit <br />There should not be a double fee for the application. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#7) #2455 ROGER AND KRISTINE STRAUMAN, 123 CHEVY CHASE DRIVE, VARIANCE, 7:48 <br />p.m. - 7:60 p.m. <br />Roger and Kristine Strauman were present. <br />Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the applicants are requesting a lot area variance to <br />remove the existing residence and construct a new residence. The lot Is approximately one-half acre. <br />Staff recommends approval of the lot area variance. <br />Roger Strauman said he has talked to the neighbors and they do not object to the proposal. <br />There were no public comments. . <br />White moved, McMillan secondec, a motion to approve Application #2455, Roger and <br />Kristine Strauman, 123 Chevy Chase Drive, for a lot area variance. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, <br />(#8) #2457 DAVID AND PAULA LINDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:61 p.m. <br />- 8:30 p.m. <br />David and Paula Lindberg were present. <br />Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the applicants propose to tear down the existing <br />house and construct a new house and garage. The surveyor has submitted a revised site plan that <br />would eliminate some the variances. One of the concerns that staff had Is that the driveway was not <br />sized to allow for an adequate back out area. The surveyor did redraw the driveway to provide the <br />applicant with a better backing out area. All of the structural hardcover is located In the 75-250' <br />setback. Van Zomeren displayed the elevations for the proposed residence. The proposed residence <br />is different that the O’Keefe proposal! The lot has the 0'-75' setback requirement on two sides. In this <br />plan, the garage is detached and located closer to the street and more of the hardcover is put into <br />structure rather than driveway. Structural coverage on this proposal Is 4,804 square feet or 15.12%.- <br />The variances that this application would need are for hardcover in the 0’-75’ setback for the <br />driveway, and hardcover in the 75'-250’ setback. Grading for the driveway would require a <br />conditional use permit because R is within five feet of the property line. She also recommended that <br />the cond'itional use permit language reflect that the topography be restored where the foundation is <br />removed. <br />The applicants had no comments. <br />Pages <br />J