My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 4:20:07 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 4:14:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 <br />(#9) U2466 James RenckenSt having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road ~ Continued <br />reason for platting the 50’ wide outlet to the north would be for a future access point for the <br />lots to the north and for this property if it were to be divided since the lot area does exist. <br />Sansevere asked why the outlet should be across Mr. Renckens’ property instead of the <br />property above it. <br />Weinberger stated that at the time the Crystal Creek subdivision was approved the outlet was <br />platted from one side to the other. Part of the reason the outlet exists is there were some <br />septic sites and some other issues with lot area and topography of the lots to the north. Lot 7 <br />does not have access. There is a temporary driveway easement across Lot 6 from the <br />temporary cul-de-sac on Crystal Creek to serve Lot 7. That was written in until the time a <br />road is developed to gain access to Lot 7. At that time the driveway easement would be <br />eliminated. Future planning is why the City staff and the Planning Commission have <br />recommended the platting of an outlot. <br />Sansevere asked if the outlot requirement was brought to Mr. Renckens’ attention by the <br />previous owner. <br />Renckens said he has not talked with Mrs. Stubbs. He said he was aware of the interest the <br />City had in the outlot, but it did not appear in his due diligence to be a serious interest <br />because the outlot didn’t seem to serve any particular benefit. He said there is access to Lot 7 <br />and there is a potential for Mr. Carlson to acquire property to the east to gain access to his <br />property. He said there is opposition to the outlot from the Rolling Meadows subdivision as <br />well as the Crystal Creek subdivision. <br />Winston explained the reduction from three lots to two lots should eliminate the need for the <br />outlot. <br />Renckens said 22,000 square feet of trees would have to be removed to put in a cul-de-sac or <br />roadway across the northern portion of the property. <br />Alan Carlson gave historical information regarding the long-range plan for the SO’ outlot. The <br />long-range plan was to extend Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane to form a loop and provide <br />access to the north. He owns 30 acres to the north that would be accessed by the outlot. He <br />reviewed previous City actions that refer to the 50’ outlot. He wants the 50’ outlot for access <br />to his 30 acres. <br />Flint asked how Mr. Renckens plans to gain access to the back of the lot. <br />Renckens said he has access from Watertown Road via a 30 ’ strip that runs on the west side <br />of the property. He has approached the Crystal Creek developers about gaining access from <br />the private road, but he has not reached an agreement with them. <br />Page 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.