My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
04-26-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 4:20:07 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 4:14:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 20,1998 <br />•• . <br />• *. ** <br />(Gary O'Keefe, continued) <br />. naracover than what is being recommended by the Planning Commission. Hardcover back In 1990 <br />without the two zones being combined was at approximately 6,800 square feel.- • ‘ <br />Chair Smith questioned whether Staff had any concerns regarding the drainage for this property. <br />Gaffron remarked Staff Is comfortable with what is being proposed. <br />Mike Sharratt, Architect, stated the O'Keefe's have reduced hardcover by eliminating the patio and <br />a portion of the driveway, but would like the Planning Commission to consider allowing a retention <br />pond as mitigation in exchange for additional hardcover. <br />Chair Smith Commented the architect has done a marvelous Job In bringing the plans Into compliance, <br />but stated the size of the house could be reduced to allow for the patio. <br />Chair SmUh asked for public comment.V-e/SfoM <br />rsig, rieiMark Versig, rieighbor, commented he is aware and In favor of what the O’Keefe’s are proposing to do, <br />noting that the drainage problems should be alleviated by the proposed grading. <br />f • <br />Sharratt stated what Is currently being proposed is the best plan for this property. <br />Gaffron stated he is In favor of the retention pond but Is not convinced It should be used as mitigation <br />for additional hardcover. <br />• . * • • <br />McMillan stated she would not be In favor of additional hardcover in exchange for the retention pond <br />since It would be setting a dangerous precedent, but felt the retention pond would be an ideal <br />solution *' the drainage Issue. <br />Lindquist stated he was In favor of the proposed plan with the exclusion of the patio. <br />Stoddard noted the size of the house or the driveway could be reduced to allow for the patio. <br />Sharratt remarked it would not be feasible to reduce the drivev/ay any further. Sharratt commented if <br />the hardcover is limited to 25%, he would not recommend reducing the size of the house to allow for <br />the patio. <br />Chair Smith stated she is in favor of keeping the hardcover at 25 percent, noting the owner will need to <br />decide whether the patio Is desired. <br />Hawn stated she also was in favor of limiting the hardcover to 25%. • <br />Gaffron .commented if the O’Keefe’s decide to add a retention pond, that would need to be done under <br />a separate application. • <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2370, granting a conditional <br />use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line and within the 0-76 ’ lakeshore protected area <br />to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence for the property <br />located at 1392 Baldur Park Road, with the understanding hardcover will be limited to 25% <br />In the combined 75-250 ’ and south 0-76* zones with no additional hardcover being allowed. <br />Per the request of the O’Keefe’s, the patio will be eliminated. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Pages <br />.1 <br />I <br />♦ ^ <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.