My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
04-12-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:44:00 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
475
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The pond may need to be increased for additional water quantity if a sub-surface storm <br />sewer system were installed which would make lot line rearrangement more difficult. <br />Storm sewer systems also require maintenance compared to surface stormwater <br />management. <br />I am familiar with Crystal Creek, one of the projects, and maybe the only smaller <br />residential development in Orono with sub-surface storm water management and curbs. <br />Pillar Homes, a homebuilding company that I own is currently building in this <br />neighborhood. The curbing easily becomes damaged. The site needed this type of storm <br />water management due to the topography, and ultimately reduces the character of a non- <br />urban streetscape. <br />BohLand Development is currently completing a twenty-lot subdivision in the City of <br />Independence that provides surface storm water management and is an important <br />characteristic to feel of the neighborhood and improves water quality. <br />At the request of the buyers already interested in purchasing in Carriage Hill, comments <br />from the MCWD, and to maintain the characteristics of a non-urban streetscape, I am <br />requesting that we approve the application that we have submitted. <br />Other changes to the revised plan includes adding trees along Willow Drive and Carriage <br />Lane. The exception to the landscapers comments would be to eliminate the additional <br />landscaping along the back of lot 4 adjoining Brown Road. This request comes form the <br />purchaser of this lot. He is requesting that additional trees not be added because of the <br />many mature trees that are already in place and keep as much remaining sunlight as <br />possible in his backyard. The other exception would be not to add any trees around the <br />cul de sac portion and along the outlet access to lot 2.1 would prefer to leave this up to <br />the l^dscape plan T . the individual homeowners and will approve all landscape plans <br />provided accordir • *o the Homeowners Association By Laws. Any trees on these portions <br />of the lots will probably be destroyed during construction. <br />The following is response to additional recommendEtions from the Planning Commission <br />dated March 16,1999. <br />1. I have submitted the CUP land alteration application and paid the appropriate fees for <br />lot 1. The tree inventory inside the grading limits for lot 1 will be completed for the <br />Final application. A larger scale grading plan has been submitted showing the 6’ <br />addition to ihe existing driveway and the proposed grading detail for lot 1. <br />2. The driveways for lots 5 and 6 will have access from Carriage Lane. <br />3. Landscape (see above) <br />4. Lot 2 yards and setbacks shown as determined by staff and Planning Commission. <br />5. Engineering. Changes made according to suggestions with the exceptions as <br />explained above.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.