Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 <br />(#2465 Robert Erickson, continued) <br />There were no public comments. <br />It is the recommendation of City Staff and the Planning Commission that this application be <br />approved based on the conditions contained in the March 17,1999 Staff report. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented that the City is not in a position at this time to vacate a portion of the <br />public roadway to the shoreline and that it should be City policy that lake access lanes not be <br />vacated. <br />Peterson remarked she has a problem with approving two non-conforming lots. <br />Gaffron stated that this application will improve the present situation in that area. <br />Sansevere suggested that signage be erected to show that there is a public access there. <br />Cronin stated he is aware of the need to keep that roadway open for public use and the Applicants <br />are willing to work with City Staff on this issue. Cronin indicated that no work would be done on this <br />area until construction is commenced. <br />Flint inquired whether the two lots could be combined to create one conforming tot. <br />Gaffron stated one of the reasons Staff supports this application is because the lot line rearrangement <br />will not increase density in this area. <br />Flint stated he would be in agreement with this application if public access to the lake is provided. <br />Sansevere inquired whether City Staff has explored any other options for these parcels. <br />Weinberger stated Staff has looked at other options but feel that this proposal best meets both <br />parties' goals, noting that it is easier to work with lots that are squared off more evenly. <br />Edckson stated they have looked at other options but feel this arrangement works the best. <br />Sansevere commented he would support this proposal. <br />Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve Application #2465,364 and 372 Westlake <br />Street, granting of a lot line rearrangement subject to the conditions outlined in the <br />March 17,1999 Staff report. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#2) PRESENTATION BY SCOTT THOMAS • CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF MCWD BOARD OF <br />MANAGERS <br />Thomas addressed the City Council and requested their support of him as a candidate for the <br />MCWD Board of Managers. Thomas stated he is a civil engineer with 20 years experience and <br />has a good understanding of the watershed process. <br />Thomas stated if elected to the MCWD Board of Managers his goals would be to, #1 . identify the <br />resources in the watershed district deady and to list the expedations of the resources for the <br />watershed distrld; #2, shift the focus of the board away from the day-to-operations; and #3, predict <br />the future needs of the watershed district by looking at a 20 year window. <br />Page 5