My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
04-12-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:44:00 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
475
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. As a result of deeding land for the cul-de-sac, at the request of Staff and the <br />Planning Commission for emergency vehicle turnaround, the subdividers shall be credited <br />for lot area as it relates to lot coverage by structure and hardcover as if the cul-de-sac had <br />not been created. The lots shall be allowed the following: <br />364 Westlake Street <br />Lot Coverage by Structure <br />, dlowed Hardcover 75-250' setback <br />9,567 s.f. <br />9,616 s.f. <br />372 Westlake Street <br />Lot Coverage by Structure <br />Allowed Hardcover 75-250' setback <br />7,926 s.f. <br />7,333 s.f. <br />8. A non-conforming septic system and drainfield are located on the 372 Westlake <br />Street parcel. In 1996, previous property owners were required to abandon the system and <br />connect to sanitary sewer. All assessments for the sewer project have been paid on the lot, <br />however, at the time a new residence is constructed the property owner(s) will be required <br />to pay a SAC fee and abandon the existing septic system. <br />9. The principal residence located on the 372 Westlake Street property is required to <br />be removed prior to filing the subdivision as it is located on the newly created property <br />line. All other buildings, including cabins, shall be removed by the subdivider. <br />10. The City ..‘ sed ‘.L-division proposal for the 372 property, however the <br />Subdivision was k because the proposed development would have created two <br />substandard lots from a conforming lot. Staff recommended the property owner attempt <br />to acquire an additional lot, not to increase density. The subdividers have purchased the <br />lot to the north (364 Westlake) to allow a lot line rearrangement without creating new <br />residential sites and increasing density. <br />11. Removal of the residences and cabins will decrease the overall "dwelling units" on <br />the properties from 4 to 2. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.