My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:38:03 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LR-lC-i Amendment <br />March 9,1999 <br />Page 2 <br />It may be appropriate to reference the Shoreland PRD standards in the LR-lC-1 section so that the <br />Shoreland standards aie not overlooked, especially since a majority of the LR-lC-1 properties yet <br />to be developed are in the Shoreland District. <br />Hardcover Standards <br />The LR-lC-1 hardcover limits of Section 10.26, Subd. 3D would appear to allow hardcover up to <br />35% in areas more than 100' from the shoreline. This is in conflict with the standards found <br />elsewhere in the code which allow only 25% hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone, 30% in the 250- <br />500 ’ zone, and 35% in the 500-1000 ’ zone. It is unknown whether this was done on purpose as a <br />concession to the LR-lC-1 district, but it does create potential confusion. Staff recommends that <br />if the LR-lC-1 district is amended rather than eliminated, Subd. 3D should be revised to conform <br />to the hardcover standards found elsewhere in the code. <br />Public Comments <br />The City has received a letter from Paul Larson, owner of a 2-acre parcel in LR-lC-1, in opposition <br />to the proposed elimination of the 50% density credit. He believes his property will become less <br />valuable if the credit is eliminated, since he will lose 1/3 of the potential dwelling units he might be <br />allowed under the current code. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Retention of the ability in LR-lC-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and <br />the preservation of trees and green space that is no: possible in the LR-IC zone. If this option is <br />chosen, reference to the Shoreland PRD regulations should be added to the LR-lC-1 language. Also, <br />the hardcover standard should be revised to match the standards found elsewhere in the zoning code. <br />Elimination of the 50% credit without retaining the ability for attached units, would functionally <br />remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-IC and LR-lC-1 Districts. In this case, <br />it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-lC-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone <br />all LR-lC-1 properties to LR-IC. <br />Staff has drafted 2 options for amending the LR-lC-1 District for discussion and recommendation <br />(Exhibits A). The first option has been revised since the last meeting to include the Shoreland <br />reference and the hardcover amendment noted above. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.