03-22-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (§10) §2456 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, HAVtNQ AN INTEREST IN 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH (PID §10-117-23-24^1) - Continued currently serves one property, 775 Brown Road. He said Zetterstrom commented that this would be a safe entrance for both properties. Bohl talked about the ponding issue on lot 4. Mabusth asked If the NURP pond could be moved further north. Bohl said it could probably move to lot 3. He said the neighbor to the southeast comer of the property has asked about the possibility of Bohl selling a small portion of the property to the neighbor for an extension of their lot. If Bohl did not sell them that portion of the property and moved the lot lines, it would be possible to meet the two-acre minimum for lot 4. White asked about the topography of the site. Bohl said the perimeter of the southerly portion is pasture land. The exception piece on the west and the southeast portion are wooded. The northerly portion of the property Is dense woods except for the wetland. White asked the purpose of the outlet attached to the cul-de-sac. Bohl said the outlet is the driveway access for lot 2. Van Zomeren said she wanted to point out the outlet and find out if that was acceptable rather than having lot 2 on the cul-de-sac. She said lot 2 is a through lot because it could have access on Willow. Mabusth said the zoning code has a section that deals with the creation of the private driveway outlets having to do with the topography, saving a wooded area, or something physical and unique to the land. Bohl said it would be nearly impossible to grade in a driveway from Willow because of the topography. Mabusth commented that all of the tots could be considered through lots, which means a conditional use permit would be required every time someone put up an accessory structure. Hawn questioned the location of the septic sites because some of them are close to each other. Bohl stated that on lots 2, 3, and 4, the septic sites would be typical drainfields because the soil for these three lots is sand. The other lots would have typical mound systems. Mabusth stated that the lot area for lot 4 will be a concern. Bohl stated he does not need to purchase that property. He said the home on that property is in need of repair. Using that property for the access would make the access more visually appealing. Bohl said if he doesnl buy that property and someone else buys it In the future, they would need a variance for the lot area. He said there is a gas tank buried on the property, but it can be cleaned up. White said there would be advantages if Bohl took possession of the tax forfeited property. White said taxes would be paid on it and it would be kept dean. Mabusth asked if Bohl would share the driveway on King Street with the property owner to the north. Bohl described the grading plan for the driveway. Page 14 1