My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:38:03 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 <br />COIIMrii »«cgTING <br />Mnk 9 9 1999 <br />ROLL: <br />UI r UH UhUNO <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting <br />Chair Elizabeth T. Hawn, Lili McMiiian, Alternate Jeanne Mabusth and Alternate James White. The <br />following represented the City Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City <br />Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul <br />Weinberger, and Recorder Lanette Wolf. <br />Acting Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />(#1) #2458 CITY OF ORONO. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, LR-1C-1, ONE FAMILY <br />LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT. SECTION 10.26. SUBD. 3. TO ELIMINATE THE <br />ALLOWANCE OF A 50% INCREASE IN DWELLING UNIT DENSITY. FROM 2 TO 3 UNITS PER <br />ACRE. 6:30 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. <br />Gaffron presented the staff report. He stated that the City Council adopted an interim moratorium in <br />May 1998 temporarily suspending use of the 50% density credit in the LR>1C>1 zoning subdistrict. <br />This moratorium was established due to a development proposal that Council believed would add too <br />much traffic to the local streets, and would add to the high volume of traffic that is already <br />overburdening County Road 15. The properties zoned LR-1C-1 are located along County Road 15 in <br />Navarre and adjacent to marinas on County Road 51 on Maxwell Bay. He said the existing <br />neighborhoods surrounding these areas were developed prior to the City’s adoption of the zoning <br />regulations, and are generally developed much more Intensely than would be allowed under the <br />current zoning regulations. He said the Council is concerned that the current density credit language <br />does not provide sufficient discretion to the City to ensure a development Is planned in such a way <br />that it provides sufficient open space, landscaping and access options to somewhat balance the <br />intensity of the surrounding development and minimize the traffic impacts. Gaffron displayed a map <br />showing the location of properties that are zoned LR-1C-1. <br />Gaffron stated that the LR-1C-1 density credit allows a 50% increase In dwelling unit density over the <br />LR-1C District. The LR-1C District requires a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, which transiatesto a <br />maximum dweiling unit density of 2 units per acre. A 50% increase in density yields 3 units per acre. <br />Gaffron said the number of multi-family dwelling units that might be developed or redeveloped in the <br />existing LR-1C-1 zones under the current code is iess than 20. He said the City has provided for <br />significant numbers of multi-famiiy dwelling units in Its Highway 12 Corridor. Gaffron said an <br />alternative to total elimination of the LR-1C-1 district is to retain the ability to use a PRD (Planned <br />Residential Development) to enable clustering and attached units. This would allow up to 4 attached <br />units and wouid retain the ability to have a variety of housing types, but at a lower overall density <br />than the current code allows. <br />Gaffron stated that staff has drafted two options. Option 1 would delete language allowing 50% <br />density credit, add language specifically allowing attached dweiling units as a Conditional Use, but <br />only if Council determines the PRD provisions are met, and add a provision to limit density to two <br />dwelling units per acre. Option 2 would delete Section 10.26 in its entirety and rezone all properties <br />in LR-1C-1 to LR-1C. <br />Gaffron stated that the property owners within the LR-1C-1 districts as well as property owners within <br />350 feet of those districts have been notified by mail of this public hearing. <br />There were no public comments <br />Hawn stated that two letters were received from residents who were in favor of limiting the density. <br />She said that the Commission members should consider whether they want to recommend a change. <br />If they do recommend a change, will they recommend a change in which the zoning is reverted to <br />Page 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.